AND NOW…IDIOTS

Monday, February 8th, 2010 | Uncategorized

MSDNC’s lesbian “reporter” Rachel “Lesbian” Maddow, who is a lesbian, lesbianally tosses a little lesbian slander around:

The opening speech last night was given by failed presidential candidate, ex-congressman and professional anti-immigrant, Tom Tancredo who started the event off with a bang, a big loud racist bang.
 
 
MSDNC editors had no immediate lesbian comment.

19 Comments to AND NOW…IDIOTS

Dale Matson
February 8, 2010

I disagree with her on pretty much everything she says. She kind of reminds me of the angry guy, whats his name? Oh yeah Keith Oblermann. Is is just me or is she kind of cute?

Intercessor
February 8, 2010

Isn’t she a lesbian?
Intercessor

Don Janousek
February 8, 2010

After having looked at a picture, I am somewhat confused. How can a guy be a lesbian? Also, she? he? it? forgot to mention the tribute being held across town by the Democrat party folks to honor Ku Klux Klan Grand Kleagle, Sen. Robert Byrd (D. West Virgina)on his 122nd birthday. Due to health problems, the old cross-burner was unable to be present for the simulated lynching, but was being attended to by a squad of Navy corpse-men.

dwstroudmd
February 8, 2010

Playing fast and loose, with the facts, and whatever else doesn’t match her idea of what should be tolerated. I guess the state should interpose her litmus tests instead of federal ones like literacy?

gppp
February 8, 2010

Dale –

I never watch her show, so I had to find pictures on the net.

To answer your question, though (with apologies to those who think I might be a pig for saying this), she can be dolled up enough to be cute. Problem is she goes to so much trouble to avoid being a woman that, as Don sort of notes, she might as well be a boy.

That aside, her militancy for her cause renders her drop dead ugly.

Allen Lewis
February 8, 2010

I happened to see her and Keith Oblberman doing their “thing” on MSPMS network. They were both disgusting! I cannot (mercifully) remember what they were talking about, but I think they were making snide remarks about those with which they virulently disagreed.

Two of the more odious TV “personalities” around.

Katherine
February 8, 2010

Cynically, I’m beginning to think eighth-grade reading and math levels should be required for all voters. We have too many totally ignorant people voting on the basis of things they don’t understand in the slightest. That wouldn’t solve the problem entirely, though, because a large majority of people with advanced degrees voted for Obama. I don’t know how to test for whether people actually think, even if they are capable of it.

Mark Windsor
February 8, 2010

Doesn’t matter, really. With her ratings, no one was watching.

ccinnova
February 8, 2010

Rachel Maddow is not just a lesbian. By her own description, she is a “butch lesbian.” She also has a Ph.D from Oxford, which ought to embarass Oxford alumni just as I’m embarassed that Katie Couric is a fellow graduate of the University of Virginia.

One has to wonder, though, how much longer MSNBC will put up with the poor ratings, especially following the bankruptcy and shutdown of Air America.

Alasdair
February 9, 2010

Err pardon me ccinnova but Oxford University does not and never has awarded Ph.D. The correct post nominal for a graduate at Doctoral level is D.Phil from that academic institution.

Saying that, as an immigrant I am way pissed (US usage) that the only question I got wrong was what damn INS (ICE now) form to use:)!!!

PS there are 13 buttons on the pants of USN enlisted for the same reason as the number of stipes on ‘Old Glory.’

God Bless America.

Janjan
February 9, 2010

Rachel who?

John
February 9, 2010

Is that all you have- ad hominem attacks?

Do you deny that Tom Tancredo’s language was racist?

Christopher Johnson
February 9, 2010

Don’t know. To whom was Tancredo referring in that quote? Do you know? Does Ms. Maddow(who is, in fact, a lesbian so I don’t know where you’re getting that ad hominem stuff from)? I suspect not. What I think happened is that Ms. Maddow heard something she didn’t happen to agree with and grabbed the first leftist cliche that popped into her head.

John
February 9, 2010

Christopher Johnson. I live in Georgia. I know a racist remark when I hear one.
The election of President Obama has led to a resurgence of overt and covert racism in America.

Christopher Johnson
February 9, 2010

And I live in Missouri. We didn’t stop fighting the Civil War until 1882. In the early 1950′s my hometown closed the swimming pool for two summers rather than allow blacks and whites to swim together. So I also know a genuinely racist remark when I hear one. Unless I know to whom Tom Tancredo was referring, I’m not going to call his statement racist simply because I don’t like the sound of it.

John
February 9, 2010

I see that Meghan McCain has called Tancredo’s remarks racist. She is hardly a liberal Democrat.

ccinnova
February 9, 2010

“I see that Meghan McCain has called Tancredo’s remarks racist. She is hardly a liberal Democrat.”

That’s because Meghan McCain is a liberal Republican. And she owes her fame and celebutante status solely to being a senator’s daughter who’s loved by the so-called “mainstream media.”

Put another way, who cares what Meghan McCain thinks, at least until she’s achieved something which would earn her the status she now enjoys.

Mark Windsor
February 10, 2010

I don’t really see Tancredo’s comments as being racist, but I do see them as futile.

Stop and think about it for a couple of minutes. The people of Minnesota elected a wrestler for governor and a comedian for the senate. The people of California elected an actor for their governor. The entire country managed to elect a president with no practical experience. Would a basic civics literacy test have changed any of these results? It’s not the uneducated lower classes that are electing these buffoons, it’s the elite of the electorate. Having the average voter define the number of stripes on our flag is inconsequential – they’ll still vote for an idiot more often than not.

ccinnova
February 10, 2010

Actually, the people of California have elected two actors as governors. The first one turned out not only to be a pretty good governor but one of the best presidents in American history. It’s too bad the second actor didn’t do as well, although he got no help from the state legislature and courts.

Leave a comment

Support The MCJ

Search

Links

Meta