TIME CHECK

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010 | Uncategorized

According to former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, one of the reasons why the Democratic Party got its ass handed to it in 1994 was Fox News:

In December 1994, Bill Clinton proposed a so-called middle-class bill of rights including more tax credits for families with children, expanded retirement accounts, and tax-deductible college tuition. Clinton had lost his battle for healthcare reform. Even worse, by that time the Dems had lost the House and Senate. Washington was riding a huge anti-incumbent wave. Right-wing populists were the ascendancy, with Newt Gingrich and Fox News leading the charge. Bill Clinton thought it desperately important to assure Americans he was on their side.

Fox News debuted in October, 1996.

UPDATE: Fox News.  So powerful that it can alter the space/time continuum.

24 Comments to TIME CHECK

Christian
January 27, 2010

Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

Katherine
January 27, 2010

Don’t confuse this argument with facts!

Jay Random
January 27, 2010

Well, if President Roosevelt could address the nation on TV in 1929, when Hoover was president and there was no TV. . . .

In other words, Reich and Biden clearly come from the same planet. And it ain’t this one.

Mrs. Lawrence
January 27, 2010

It looks as if this mention of Fox News has been corrected.

Dale Matson
January 27, 2010

Since when do post modernists concern themselves with the truth in making a point.

Smurf Breath
January 27, 2010

Why would he feel impelled to add a reference to Fox News in the first place? I suppose he goes around wishing it could somehow be silenced, so the reference flowed naturally. That is what bothers me the most about the left. There does not seem to be respect for any core American value such as free speech, or inalienable rights (ie rights that cannot be taken away, even by majority vote). I for one don’t want to live in Rob’s reich.

KC
January 27, 2010

Well , Chris, it is clear that Mr. Peobody and Sherman took the WayBack Machine back to 1994 and broadcast tapes of Fox …causing a ripple in the space/time continuim…

JM
January 27, 2010

A study by the University of Chicago and Stanford University compared major news media to the political views of members of Congress and found all the major TV networks’ news coverage to be slanted more in the liberal direction, except Fox.

http://www.polsci.ucsb.edu/faculty/glasgow/mediabias.pdf

But those academics are just a bunch of tea-partiers.

JM
January 27, 2010

Correction: Those universities funded and assisted with the study. They didn’t write it.

JM
January 27, 2010

Of course, the study is post-1996. Prior to that Fox News was a right wing frat house.

ccinnova
January 27, 2010

How come the elite always use “right-wing” for describing conservatives but “progressive” for describing liberals?

Don Janousek
January 27, 2010

Such dopes! I have an undergraduate degree in Political Science and have always been a self-taught historian, so I remember 1994 quite well. Any maroon knows Fox News was not around then. As I recall, it was MCJ, Sarah Palin and George Wallace who led the charge for Gingrich and the Republicans. And I also recall how angry President Lyndon Johnson was at the time. Now, as to 1996 and the Kennedy-Nixon debates..but that’s another story.

Allen Lewis
January 28, 2010

Smurf Breath’s Rob’s reich and Christian’s evocation of <strong1984; two great ripostes to this silliness.

I also see that the Salon – what a precious news machine! – article went AWOL all of a suddne. Fact checking, anyone???

Jim McNeely+
January 28, 2010

Rush Limbaugh is right. How do you know when I liberal politician is lying? Answer: His lips are moving.

-Jim+

Dale Matson
January 28, 2010

KC,
“Well , Chris, it is clear that Mr. Peobody and Sherman took the WayBack Machine back to 1994 and broadcast tapes of Fox …causing a ripple in the space/time continuim…” I think you are on to something. It helps explain why Reich is a little “short” on facts. Continuing with your line of reasoning, I’d have to say Reich reminds me a bit of Snidely Whiplash.

midwestnorwegian
January 28, 2010

Liberal “historians” have always had free access to H.G. Wells’ time machine.

KC
January 28, 2010

Dale

what gives me “Hope” is that Dudley always shows up on time and saves Nell!

Katherine
January 28, 2010

Apparently the software here doesn’t like quotation marks, along with multiple links. Be warned.

The reference to Mr. Peabody and his boy Sherman warms my heart.

c matt
January 28, 2010

Doesn’t matter that FOX News wasn’t around back then…they are just that powerful!

Jay Random
January 28, 2010

Continuing with your line of reasoning, I’d have to say Reich reminds me a bit of Snidely Whiplash.

Nah. Whatever else you say about him, Snidely was always his own man. There was room for just one villain in his dastardly plots, and if anybody was going to do any villaining when Snidely was around, it had better be Snidely himself. He wouldn’t have been caught dead sucking up to Fearless Leader the way Reich does.

Kathleen Lundquist
January 28, 2010

To add to the Bullwinkle references:

Did anyone hear echoes during President Obama’s speech last night of Bullwinkle himself: “This time fer sure!!!” – ?

JM
January 28, 2010

ccinnova, it is because liberalism, like cancer, is a progressive disease.

Rod
January 29, 2010

Now Chris, don’t be — ahem — “short” with Reich.

[...] Clinton challenge Barack Obama in 2012? CNN’s Jack Cafferty thinks so; There’s a reason why the President takes a teleprompter everywhere he goes; Rowan Williams and a number of other theologians are in New York discussing the economy; the [...]

Support The MCJ

Search

Links

Meta