ALL-IN

Thursday, November 5th, 2009 | Uncategorized

The Episcopal Organization throws its light weight behind NannerMcBotoxCare:

The Episcopal Public Policy Network (EPPN) has issued an appeal for church members to urge Congress to pass the Affordable Health Care for America Act of 2009.

1,900 pages with an 800-page amendment. 

“Health care costs have been sky rocketing. Many people don’t have access to insurance, affordable or not,” a Nov. 4 EPPN alert said. “The time for action is now.”

And nobody at EPPN has read a word of it.

The EPPN alert, which is emailed to about 25,000 Episcopalians and religious advocates, noted that the House of Representatives is poised to vote on H.R. 3962, Affordable Health Care for America Act of 2009, which would provide access to affordable health care insurance for every person regardless of age, income, or health care status. “Passage of this bill will mark the beginning of the effort to guarantee the assurance of affordable, quality health care coverage and peace of mind to American families, providing them with better care while costing them less,” the alert said.

But Democrats proposed it so there’s no need to actually know what’s in the thing.

The Episcopal Church has passed resolutions on numerous occasions stating that all people should have access to quality affordable health care. Most recently, July’s General Convention passed several health-care-related resolutions (C071, D048 and D088) in support of universal access to quality and affordable health care in the United States and called on Congress to pass comprehensive health-care reform this year.

It’s such a great bill that Democrats have begun threatening its critics.

President Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and their Democratic followers in Congress have a rather draconian message for the private sector: Speak now, and we’ll make you forever hold your peace.

Up until a few weeks ago, America’s health insurers were sheepishly on board with the Obama-Pelosi health care reform plan. Perhaps the industry feared that voicing any concern about the plan would unleash the ire of an increasingly rabid Democratic majority on Capitol Hill. As it turns out, the health insurers were right.

No longer able to sit idly by while the President and his chief minion in the House amateurishly try to revamp one-sixth of the U.S. economy, the health insurance industry released a study they commissioned that analyzes the costs of the Obama-Pelosi plan. The results are quite sobering. The study shows that “between 2010 and 2019 the cumulative increases in the cost of a typical family policy under this reform proposal will be approximately $20,700 more than it would be under the current system.” (Emphasis mine.)

Rather than challenge the study’s results on merit, Obama and Pelosi wasted no time demonizing the health insurance industry with hyperbole and rhetoric. And then Pelosi lowered the boom, expressing “tremendous interest” in revoking the industry’s decades-old antitrust exemption. This proved to be no empty threat, as the Democrat-run House Judiciary Committee promptly passed a bill to do exactly that.

The real issue is that Obama and Pelosi are using the power of Congress to muzzle the speech of a private sector industry, First Amendment be damned. It couldn’t be more blatant. Stay quiet about their disaster of a health plan, and Obama and Pelosi will leave you alone. Point out how their plan will actually make matters worse, and Obama and Pelosi will hit you back with new laws that hurt your business.

Let’s see.  Keep your mouth shut or it’ll cost you big-time.  Accept the new order or get sued out of your meeting house.  Toe the line or we’ll “interpret” the canons, declare that you’ve “broken communion” and depose your ass.  I can see why the Episcopal Organization is so enthusiastic about NannerMcBotoxCare.

18 Comments to ALL-IN

JM
November 5, 2009

Confirming again the First Law of Religious Organizations: The doctrine of any revisionist religious sect is indistinguishable from left-wing political dogma.

Anyone who thinks that the cost of healthcare will be reduced by taxing insurance companies, health care providers and consumers, and creating a huge new federal bureaucracy, must be a Democrat on crack. Or an Episcopalian. But I repeat myself.

M. L. Martin
November 5, 2009

When can we expect people to start screaming about “separation of church and state”? ;-)

Stephen
November 5, 2009

“Passage of this bill will mark the beginning of the effort to guarantee the assurance of affordable, quality health care coverage and peace of mind to American families, providing them with better care while costing them less,”

I think we need to block out some time to schedule a moment to ponder this beginning of the effort to guarantee the assurance of health care. You don’t want to jump into beginning an effort to guarantee an assurance of anything without proper forethought.

Ed the Roman
November 5, 2009

“Confirming again the First Law of Religious Organizations: The doctrine of any revisionist religious sect is indistinguishable from left-wing political dogma.”

Actually, it’s a special case of somebody else’s law: any organization not explicitly right-wing will become left-wing.

M. L. Martin
November 5, 2009

Ed the Roman–That’s O’Sullivan’s law, formulated by a former editor of National Review. It’s a cousin to Neuhaus’s Law: Where orthodoxy is made optional, sooner or later, orthodoxy will be proscribed.

Christopher Johnson
November 5, 2009

All I know is that just about any version of the Bible you can name is shorter than NannerMcBotoxCare and the Bible is merely the Word of the Living God.

FW Ken
November 5, 2009

And apparently the administration is just getting ramped up:

http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/theanchoress/2009/11/04/yes-obama-will-shut-down-the-net/

qwerty
November 5, 2009

LOL… It’s amusing that they believe the Episcopal Public Policy Network has any political influence whatsoever.

Jim McNeely+
November 5, 2009

The Episcopal Organization: The Democrat Party at Prayer.

Bill (not IB)
November 5, 2009

So, they’re concerned about “affordable health care”. But it’s OK to provide pre-emptive death care for the unborn.

The day that TEC shows respect for the unborn is the day I’ll at least *consider* anything else they say on social issues. Until then – “La la la, I can’t hear you…….”

J.M. Heinrichs
November 5, 2009

Blair’s Law: http://timblair.blogspot.com/2002_05_19_archive.html#76862981
“… the ongoing process by which the world’s multiple idiocies are becoming one giant, useless force.”

Cheers

Katherine
November 5, 2009

This is why no money should ever go in an Episcopal offering plate. It funds insanity.

Llano Estacado
November 6, 2009

Amen, Katherine.

LaVallette
November 6, 2009

Welcome to the Episcopalian/Do Gooddie Paradise on earth!!!. It is a variation of the ‘Robbing’ Hood philosophy: steal from those who work hard and give freely to those who are members of the “you owe me victimhood” sitting on their behind and protecting their hands from getting any work callouses, and never paid a penny in tax in their entire lives..

P.S. Does anyone still remember that demented black women on the night of Obama’s election who declared that henceforth she won’t have to pay for her mortgage any more or her petrol etc etc!! Who the hell did she think was going to pay for it? Stupid question: Obama and the Demoncrats in Congress, of course. Where are they getting their money from? Who cares!!!

Don Janousek
November 6, 2009

LaVallette: “Who the hell did she think was going to
pay for it?” Why, YOU, of course. And ME. And our host on this site. And the woman down the block from you who owns her own business. And the hard-working farmer who lives a few miles outside of town. Why, Land O’ Goshen, LaVallette, there’s all kindsa folks available to “pay for it.” Welcome to ObamaLand.

Dale Matson
November 6, 2009

Katherine,
“This is why no money should ever go in an Episcopal offering plate. It funds insanity.” I only wish it funded insanity. I think this is malice in the first degree.

Allen Lewis
November 7, 2009

Better yet, this is why no money should go to pay for Democratic Representatives and Senators. They have all gone around the bend to see who can be the first to bankrupt every working man and woman in this country.

Amy P.
November 8, 2009

Late last night, the Democrat party gave all of us who oppose this particular version of health care reform the collective finger.

We have a long, high-stakes battle ahead in the Senate to stop this liberal-agenda-gone wild bill from becoming law.

Because abortion is the least of the worries. How badly do you think the we-hate-Catholic-teaching-on-contraception crowd will be itching to force contraception on families who have more than 1 or 2 kids?

The possible avenues for personal privacy encroachment are tremendous; but I guess so long as Congress doesn’t outlaw promiscuous sex the Episcopal leadership is okay with whatever crap they force on us.

Leave a comment

Support The MCJ

Search

Links

Meta