ICHABOD

Saturday, June 27th, 2009 | Uncategorized

Greg Griffith alerts me to the story of a monster:

A Duke University official has been charged in federal court with offering his 5-year-old adopted son up for sex. Frank Lombard, associate director at the university’s Global Health Institute, was arrested Wednesday in Raleigh, the FBI said.

An unidentified informant who already faces child porn charges in a different child sex case pointed investigators to Lombard, according to court documents. The informant told investigators he had met Lombard on the Internet four years ago. The informant described in graphic detail how he allegedly observed Lombard molesting an African-American child on four occasions over an Internet video chat service called ICUii.

The informant said, according to court papers, that Lombard, who is white, said that he lived in the Raleigh-Durham area of North Carolina and that the child was one of two adopted African-Americans in his custody.

Lombard allegedly used the adult Internet service to conduct his video chats. According to an affidavit in support of the arrest warrant, the Internet service indicated that Lombard’s profile “stated he was interested in “perv fam fun,” a reference to “incestuous child molestation.” The service also told investigators that a customer service complaint had been sent to the company in January 2007. A customer who had chatted with Lombard complained to the company that Lombard said he was “into incest” and had adopted two African-American children, court records said.

A Washington, D.C., police detective who was investigating the case set up undercover chats with someone matching Lombard’s description during which the detective says he was invited to fly to Raleigh to have sex with the person’s 5- year-old adopted child. In his affidavit, Det. Timothy Palchak wrote that he engaged in a chat with someone using the screen name “FL” who provided nude pictures of himself. The pictures matched Lombard’s North Carolina driver’s license photo, according to the affidavit.

During the chats, according to the affidavit, “FL” told undercover investigators that he had himself molested his child, whom he adopted as an infant, and that he had allowed others to molest his child. “FL” stated that “the abuse of the child was easier when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening, but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the molestation,” Palchak wrote in his affidavit.  

Greg has the affidavit for the arrest warrant available here but I warn you that it is very graphic.  Griffith also discovered something else.

What makes this story more than something to mention in passing, is that there is a Frank Lombard, with a Duke email address, on the vestry of the Episcopal Church of the Advocate in nearby Carrboro, North Carolina (listed here as a “gay friendly” church)… who is involved in anti-racism efforts.

I’m not trying to score moral points at the expense of the Episcopalians and neither should you.  Search your own hearts.  You know what evil has resided there in the past or resides there still.  Certainly nothing to this extent but all of us have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.

We all know or know of perfectly fine people whose children turned out to be criminals.  And this Lombard could have been a member of any church.  There have been numerous monsters in pews and in front of them all over the Christian spectrum, from liberal churches to conservative ones, and there will no doubt be many more. 

We live in a fallen world.

But what do you do if you discover that someone you prayed with, took Holy Communion with, sat in vestry meetings with, drank coffee after the service with or attended church social functions with turned out to be a Frank Lombard? 

Do you and your fellow parishioners think long and hard about what you’ve been preaching and proclaiming to this fallen world?  Do you issue a statement expressing your horror?  Do you tell the world that from now on, your number one priority, to the exclusion of everything else, is the healing and security of those little boys?

Or do you fall all over yourselves to pretend that your Frank Lombard never existed?

11:38 am: The Episcopal Church of the Advocate is busy erasing all traces of Lombard from their web site. Minutes ago they pulled Lombard’s name from the vestry listing at their site. Fortunately, Google has this cached version available, and we’ve archived this screen capture on our server. Calls to the church during this time have gone directly to voice mail.here. Our cached version is here.

11:46 am: The Episcopal Church of the Advocate has also pulled the “Who’s Who” PDF from their server, previously located here. Our cached version is here.

UPDATE: The Church of the Advocate doesn’t get it.

June 28, 8:28 am: The Episcopal Church of the Advocate has altered the newsletter PDF referenced above. Their altered version is found here on their web site. We saved the original version and cached it here.

UPDATE: The church is feeling the heat.  Lombard’s name’s back on the vestry page.

43 Comments to ICHABOD

Our Heroine
June 27, 2009

As Mark Shea would say, “If only Episcopalians could marry…”

KC
June 27, 2009

not getting near the coverage of the Lacrosse players….wonder why?

“Frank Lombard, associate director at the university’s Global Health Institute, was arrested Wednesday in Raleigh,” …. I bet he’s all for the MDG”s

goddessoftheclassroom
June 27, 2009

I know the grace of Christ is enough for even this sinner, but I wish earthly justice were even more punitive.

Laura R.
June 27, 2009

“I’m not trying to score moral points at the expense of the Episcopalians and neither should you …
But what do you do if you discover that someone you prayed with, took Holy Communion with … turned out to be a Frank Lombard? … Do you issue a statement expressing your horror? … Or do you fall all over yourselves to pretend that your Frank Lombard never existed?”

Getting straight to the heart of the matter as usual, Christopher.

Therese Z
June 27, 2009

“ICUii”

I see you, small eyes.

I swear “small eyes” is a con name for a child molester, but googling isn’t helping me.

LaVallette
June 27, 2009

“I’m not trying to score moral points at the expense of the Episcopalians and neither should you. Search your own hearts. You know what evil has resided there in the past or resides there still. Certainly nothing to this extent but all of us have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.”

St Alphonos Liguori put it more succinctly: “There, but for the Grace of God, go I”.

Laura R.
June 27, 2009

Follow-up thought: maybe — to stretch to give them the benefit of the doubt — the people at Church of the Advocate are busy erasing all traces of this man from their website because they want to make it clear that he is not *now* a part of their parish life in any way whatsoever — and they will issue a statement soon acknowledging his past role there while expressing their horror, publicly committing themselves to the welfare and security of the little boys, etc. For their own sake one would hope so. We shall see.

Fuinseoig
June 27, 2009

No triumphalism from this side of the fence, Christopher.

It’s a peculiarly nasty twist that he adopted these children, apparently for the sole purpose of abusing them, but that seems to be the pattern for paedophiles – men who marry women with young children to have access to them or men who adopt/foster children for the same purpose.

God have mercy on us all.

Christopher Johnson
June 27, 2009

I hope so, Laura. I hope that the reason they erased Lombard’s existence so quickly was that they were so horrified about what happened that they wanted to immediately forget that they were ever associated with this man which is an entirely understandable sentiment.

Fr F
June 27, 2009

Thank you for your balanced yet straight-to-the-heart-of-the-issue approach, Chris. This is so very much à propos for me right now, having in the last 48 hours discovered certain unsavoury facts – though nowhere near in this league, I have to say – about one of my most valued clerical colleagues (“someone [I] prayed with, took Holy Communion with, sat in vestry meetings with, drank coffee after the service with or attended church social functions with”) and being in something of a quandary as to what to do (it’s not clear whether his actions were illegal, but they were surely immoral). But if “everyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart”, then rather a lot of us are likely to be in trouble, and you’re right to remind us of that. Pray for a good outcome – God’s outcome – both in the situation you relate and in mine.

Don Janousek
June 27, 2009

Why all the repressive shock and horror? From some of the latest garbage I have had the misfortune to have read, five year olds are “sexual beings” just like everyone else. And if adoptive-Pa can make a few bucks in the matter, so much the better. (Sorry. Must go find a screwdriver to remove my tongue from my cheek. Is severely stuck there.)

Bill (not IB)
June 27, 2009

Two things –

1) Erasing this slimeball from the parish website WITHOUT posting an apology/explanation smacks of cowardice. There’s nothing wrong with taking him down – AFTER you’ve acknowledged that he *was* there, and has been officially removed because of his actions/words, which you do not support, condone, etc.

2) For once, I’ll stick up for TEC. IMHO, this kind of monstrous conduct has nothing to do any church affiliation – it’s a manifestation of evil. A person who would do these things is a true psychopath, and would behave the same whether in TEC, the RCC, LCMS, etc. What I will find more telling is how the parish deals with the matter in the days/weeks to come – as I note in item #1.

The Little Myrmidon
June 27, 2009

“ICUii”

I see you, small eyes.

I swear “small eyes” is a con name for a child molester, but googling isn’t helping me.

I thought the same thing and posted to that effect earlier on SFiF, but someone later posted that ICUii is not connected to pedophilia. You are correct that “short eyes” is a prison term for child molester.

Try Googling “short eyes” and you’ll get it on the first try.

Whitestone
June 27, 2009

If they only knew how much therapy this poor helpless child will need to even approach normal in this life, they would put Lombard away for life and should consider capital punishment.

And did you know there are those within the APA who are lobbying the APA to consider child sexual relations NORMAL. They should be shot dead by a firing squad for even considering such a thing.

The same month VGR was desecrated, the Kansas legislature entertained a bill lowering the age of consent for sex to 12.
Sick people, sick church (TEO) sick country (Obama is sponsoring Gay pride month). Identifying as ‘Gay’ is a disorder. These people should not be allowed to adopt children.

The Little Myrmidon
June 27, 2009

And by the way, before everyone here starts getting all worked up over the possibility of a Max. 20 year prison sentence (and whether or not that’s a good thing) if this guy is tried and convicted it won’t make any difference how long the sentence is. He won’t last more than a few weeks inside. You can take this to the bank, if he goes to prison he’ll be knifed or beaten to death (as was Fr. Geoghan) in no time.

JM
June 27, 2009

Maybe this is one of those sins of others that the Episcopal Organizaton might want to apologize for?

The Little Myrmidon
June 27, 2009

“11:38 am: The Episcopal Church of the Advocate is busy erasing all traces of Lombard from their web site.”

They may have missed one item on the Church of the Advocate’s Children and Youth page. I could be wrong, but the top picture in the right sidebar has a guy that looks like the face in the “monster” link above.

John Swift
June 27, 2009

Oh common you guys. If only he and his partner had been able to marry in church, he never would have gone in this peculiar direction. It’s so obvious that he is reacting to years of shame and stigma. We need to fight for true equality for gay men so that they are not driven to act out in this unfortunate way.

Katherine
June 27, 2009

Bingo, Little Myrmidon. That’s the guy. I’ve been checking Triangle websites for confirmation of the guy’s connection to the parish. Nothing so far. But there he is.

Katherine
June 27, 2009

The Church of the Advocate is a totally “social gospel, inclusive” place. It’s their mission. This is why a gay man with two adopted black children was there. They celebrated the image he presented, I am sure. This is not to say that they knew he was a pedophile. I assume they didn’t. But were these two children in the church nursery? Did no one notice anything unusual about the kids? They seemed perfectly normal in every way? Or did church people not focus because, after all, Frank and his children were so wonderful?

Danby
June 28, 2009

Myrmidon,
We could wish that were true, but it’s not. I have a neighbor who served 4 years for sodomizing at least 6 boys, including an 18 month old. He’s out and ready to offend again.

Coincidentally, I got my wife a plastic man-sized silhouette target for her handgun practice. She has three very tight groupings, head, chest, and…..lower. I was so proud of her I set it up in the back field where our new neighbor can see it every day.

Katherine
June 28, 2009

Danby, I assume you’ve also alerted all the neighbors within sight who have sons? Four years in prison is not enough. Someone like that is a serious pedophile and my understanding is that they are seldom cured.

Wolverine
June 28, 2009

Much as I can understand the impulse to drop all ties to a child molester (as suggested by Mr. Johnson) a church in this situation should be all about offering what counseling and help they can to both the perp and his victims. It’s up to God to say “I never knew you.”

Of course, if the church is a “progressive” one that has forgotten the importance of grace, we should not be surprised if the church, presented with a henous thing like this, were to act in a legalistic manner and seperate itself as quickly as possible.

A Christian church would abhor the sin but at least try to save the sinner. The Church of the Advocate doesn’t necessarily qualify.

Wolverine

diane with a small d
June 28, 2009

No triumphalism here, either. God help those poor kids!!!!

Allen Lewis
June 28, 2009

One of my (former) Episcopal priest’s favorite lines was “We live in a broken and sinful world.”

It is also true that we are “broken and sinful people” very much in need of the grace of God in our lives to heal and mend us.

We should be praying for Frank Lombard. He needs God’s grace and healing more than ever.

We should be praying for those two little children. They will need a lot of psychological/psychiatric counseling and treatment. They are also the wards of DSS in North Carolina. That is enough to make me pray for their safety. DSS means well, but their track record is not all that great.

We should be praying for the people in the Church of the Advocate, that they will not be blinded by defensiveness and that they will pray for forgiveness and healing in their pride and vanity.

And we should be praying for ourselves, that we not be consumed by self-righteous indignation so that we imagine ourselves better than we are. Yes, we may not be pedophiles, but we are still miserable sinners in need of God’s grace.

Kyrie eleison!
Christe elieson!
Kyrie elieson!

Perpetua
June 28, 2009

Wolverine,
I hope you are, like John Swift, writing satire. Obviously, a church cannot keep dangerous people in its midst. The idea that a church with children should harbor pedophiles is evil.

Katherine
June 28, 2009

I could recommend that the priest visit Lombard in prison. That will be difficult once he’s transferred to DC, but he’ll probably be back to face state charges when they are filed.

The children will be placed elsewhere and never see the Church of the Advocate again, probably. The church will never know where they went.

I keep surfing Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill news sites. The silence about this guy is deafening. When other scandalous stories have hit, we heard what the accused ate for breakfast and what color socks they wore, pretty much. Think about the Duke lacrosse insanity. I don’t think this lack of biographical information about Lombard is because the news people have learned their lesson. I think it’s because as a partnered gay white man with black adopted children he suits their agenda perfectly, and they can’t bear to part with their rosy view.

FW Ken
June 28, 2009

I wrote a long-ish post that disappeared, but I feel a need to say this:

Perpetua, the church is filled with dangerous people right now, that would include you and me. While I don’t subscribe to “total depravity”, I do take seriously the fallen state of humanity, including myself.

In fact, I have known two congregations that “harbor” sex offenders, and other persons heavily involved in the criminal justice system. People keep an eye on their kids, but you know what: they should be doing that anyway. The church has rapists and child molesters in her ranks right now. Better the known, identified perpetrator.

And that’s true when you go to Walmart, too, by the way. The only true defense your kids have is you. The rest of us are here to help only.

It’s easy to get a visceral reaction to these things. I deal daily with the most heinous of sex offenders, but when one of them wanted to attend my parish, all that professionalism went out the window and it was “not around MY kids”. BTW, I don’t have children and had only one friend with a kid. But they were “my kids”. Anyway, we met with the priest and religius educ director and my guy laid out what he had done. The point is that the people who needed to know knew and he was watched while he went there.

If it’s any comfort, most sexual abuse occurs within the family anyway. Statistically, your kids are safer at church (or Walmart) than at a family reunion. Cold comfort, I know, but it’s true.

Katherine
June 28, 2009

Once Lombard is through with prison/jail, either convicted and served his term or acquitted, then yes, FW Ken, he needs to be in church. Like every one of us, he needs God’s forgiveness. He’ll be forever identified and the church will need to see that he never works directly with children. But he is human, and in need of the Savior.

FW Ken
June 28, 2009

Katherine -

I have been to a couple of “Safe Child” seminars recently, which are mostly case presentations on child sexual abuse. They are never about same-sex abuse. One was men simultaneously abusing their daughters on webcams. The other was about teenage prostitutes – female – advertising on Craigslist and Backpage.

BTW, sex offenders are on MySpace, Facebook, and every other internet network you can name. Parents: watch your kids.

JM
June 28, 2009

“The point is that the people who needed to know knew and he was watched while he went there.”

FW Ken, how do you determine the circle of people who need to know about a person of proven dangerous propensities? Everybody? Everybody with kids?

What do newcomers learn? Is a person like that assigned a minder?

I can’t believe that people at Church of the Advocate knew Lombard was a child-abusing monster. That means he successfully concealed it from his friends for many years.

Sasha
June 28, 2009

JM: the same thing (at least those children weren’t his adopted offspring) applies to John Gallienne (also a sodomite) – who’s now the music-director of “St. John the Evangelist Anglican Church”, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. At his previous post at Kingston Cathedral, he molested a good number of children and was finally put in prison. The bishop of that cathedral said that he instructed all the churches of his diocese to NEVER allow Gallienne anything other than monitored worship; whereas he, after getting out on parole, got accepted at that most “liberal” of all “Anglican churches” of the nation’s capital (for crying out loud!!!).

There he’s supposed to be monitored to ensure he doesn’t interact with children; but, I’d far rather he, given his crimes, were imprisoned for life (or executed) than EVER to be let out under any conditions, PERIOD!!!!

diane with a small d
June 29, 2009

FW Ken: If you do not mind me asking, what do you do for a living that would involve daily contact with sex offenders? Whatever it is, God bless you and support you with His Grace. I would be a completely unraveled basketcase if I had to do work like that.

FW Ken
June 29, 2009

JM –

Who should know is an interesting question, which I think demands a different answer based on the size and nature of the parish, and exactly what you are dealing with. Our parish has an ASA of 1900, and you certainly don’t want a general announcement. In a small parish, it might be different. Also, if the guy is on parole or probation, he likely won’t be allowed to participate in anything but worship services. I suspect the priest would arrange confessions outside of the scheduled times. In the case I described, Father requred he attend the Sat. evening Mass (no religious ed, mostly older folks), sit in his line of sight, and be on the property only during Mass times and a few minutes either end. This guy ended up coming to our parish only a couple of times, and I was there to watch him both times. He changed to a small charismatic congregation that has a lot of sex offenders and other folks with criminal background. We met with the pastor, went over his history, and I’m not sure what they did otherwise. I do know a parole officer and his wife go to church there, and he was alerted as well. If memory serves, I also let this guy go to a special program for folks with criminal backgrounds on one week night. I had one guy go to a large charismatic church. We met with the pastor, associate pastor, and a police officer who does security for them. That guy always went with a chaperone, got the cop to watch if he needed to use the bathroom, and so on.

diane – thank you for your words, although for my money, the biggest stars should go to folks who work in nursing homes. That’s just a personal feeling. I am a parole officer.

Perpetua
June 29, 2009

FW Ken,

Bad news — adults who sexually molest children can not be rehabilitated.

The Roman Catholic Church learned that the hard way. Their over emphasis on rehabilitation of the molesters at the expense of the children has been well documented.

Naivete about this is unacceptable in church leaders now. You need to re-direct your compassion towards the innocent children and focus on protecting them.

Sasha
June 29, 2009

Perpetua:

I remember reading as much in a number of places. That in itself is an argument for capital punishment of those wretches (among many others!): much of our law-relaxation starting around 1750 was predicated upon the belief of people being salvageable. [Up to then, all you needed to do to be hanged, even as a child of eight in the UK, was to steal a handkerchief.]

Of course, that entire philosophy is based upon the assumption of Mankind being good – which is the furthest thing from the truth!!! [Genesis 8:21, Psalm 51, Jeremiah 17:9, Romans 3:23 and Matthew 19:17 ALL make it plain that Mankind is evil even from conception.]

diane in nc with a small d
June 30, 2009

You need to re-direct your compassion towards the innocent children and focus on protecting them.

Perpetua, with all due respect, how do you know FW Ken is not doing so?

FW Ken
June 30, 2009

Perpetua -

In what sense does your comment relate to anything I wrote? I said nothing about “rehabilitation”. And you really don’t have a clue about were my “compassion” lies.

Perhaps you feel grateful to God that you are not as these men are, but I prefer the old saw I learned in the Baptist Sunday Schools of my youth: there but for the grace of God go I.

diane in nc with a small d
June 30, 2009

Thank you, FW Ken. Perpetua’s comment rubbed me the wrong way, too, and it wasn’t even directed at me, LOL.

Men in My Town
June 30, 2009

Thank God, the DC Police and the Feds for stopping Lombard. Pray that the child receives the love and support he will need to grow up strong and live in peace.

My name is Keith Smith. I was abducted, beaten and raped by a stranger. It wasn’t a neighbor, a coach, a relative, a family friend or teacher. It was a recidivist pedophile predator who spent time in prison for previous sex crimes; an animal hunting for victims in the quiet suburbs of Lincoln, Rhode Island.

I was able to identify the guy and the car he was driving. He was arrested and indicted but never went to trial. His trial never took place because he was brutally beaten to death in Providence before his court date. 34 years later, no one has ever been charged with the crime.

In the time between the night of my assault and the night he was murdered, I lived in fear. I was afraid he was still around town. Afraid he was looking for me. Afraid he would track me down and kill me. The fear didn’t go away when he was murdered. Although he was no longer a threat, the simple life and innocence of a 14-year-old boy was gone forever. Carefree childhood thoughts replaced with the unrelenting realization that my world wasn’t a safe place. My peace shattered by a horrific criminal act of sexual violence.

Over the past 34 years, I’ve been haunted by horrible, recurring memories of what he did to me. He visits me in my sleep. There have been dreams–nightmares actually–dozens of them, sweat inducing, yelling-in-my-sleep nightmares filled with images and emotions as real as they were when it actually happened. It doesn’t get easier over time. Long dead, he still visits me, silently sneaking up from out of nowhere when I least expect it. From the grave, he sits by my side on the couch every time the evening news reports a child abduction or sex crime. I don’t watch America’s Most Wanted or Law and Order SVU, because the stories are a catalyst, triggering long suppressed emotions, feelings, memories, fear and horror. Real life horror stories rip painful suppressed memories out from where they hide, from that recessed place in my brain that stores dark, dangerous, horrible memories. It happened when William Bonin confessed to abducting, raping and murdering 14 boys in California; when Jesse Timmendequas raped and murdered Megan Kanka in New Jersey; when Ben Ownby, missing for four days, and Shawn Hornbeck, missing for four years, were recovered in Missouri.

Despite what happened that night and the constant reminders that continue to haunt me years later, I wouldn’t change what happened. The animal that attacked me was a serial predator, a violent pedophile trolling my neighborhood in Lincoln, Rhode Island looking for young boys. He beat me, raped me, and I stayed alive. I lived to see him arrested, indicted and murdered. It might not have turned out this way if he had grabbed one of my friends or another kid from my neighborhood. Perhaps he’d still be alive. Perhaps there would be dozens of more victims and perhaps he would have progressed to the point of silencing his victims by murdering them.

Out of fear, shame and guilt, I’ve been silent for over three decades, not sharing with anyone the story of what happened to me. No more. The silence has to end. What happened to me wasn’t my fault. The fear, the shame, the guilt have to go. It’s time to stop keeping this secret from the people closest to me, people I care about, people I love, my long-time friends and my family. It’s time to speak out to raise public awareness of male sexual assault, to let other survivors know that they’re not alone and to help survivors of rape and violent crime understand that the emotion, fear and memories that may still haunt them are not uncommon to those of us who have shared a similar experience.

My novel, Men in My Town, was inspired by these actual events. Men in My Town is available now at http://www.Amazon.com

For those who suffer in silence, I hope my story brings some comfort, strength, peace and hope.

For additional information, please visit the Men in My Town blog at http://www.meninmytown.wordpress.com

[...] THE REST OF THE STORY– “What makes this story more than something to mention in passing, is that there is a [...]

Perpetua
July 1, 2009

No, FW Ken,

“I deal daily with the most heinous of sex offenders, but when one of them wanted to attend my parish … Anyway, we met with the priest and religius educ director and my guy laid out what he had done. The point is that the people who needed to know knew and he was watched while he went there…”

doesn’t cut it.

The parents deserve to know who the heinous sex offender is that you are allowing into their midst. I everyone in the church deserves to know this man’s past. If he is truly repentant, he will not object. If he is using your church to get to other children, then he will object.

And people who don’t want to risk having their children around him deserve to go find another church without any guilt trips from you.

uaknmqv
October 2, 2009

xMwn6J dkftjovdolik, [url=http://gpxhlzpdxqni.com/]gpxhlzpdxqni[/url], [link=http://getvrowmjnya.com/]getvrowmjnya[/link], http://nuykxpkgjpfu.com/

Support The MCJ

Search

Links

Meta