STANDING 8-COUNT

Friday, April 24th, 2009 | Uncategorized

Reality’s landing punches at-will on Genpo’s head and body, the ringside doctor’s starting to stand up and a towel should be flying into the ring any minute now.  Both the bishop and the standing committee of Maryland, one of the most reliably liberal dioceses in TEO, vote no.  As for how the judges are scoring the fight, right now(3:45 PM) it stands 26 bishops and 13 standing committees NO, 10 bishops and 1 standing committee YES.

12 Comments to STANDING 8-COUNT

Steve L.-
April 24, 2009

Bets that the PBess will circumvent the rules and sneak Thew into the HOB?

J.M. Heinrichs
April 24, 2009

Don’t see New Hampshire listed …

Cheers

Christopher Johnson
April 24, 2009

Can’t see it happening, Steve. Considering the number of bishops who have voted against, the Peeb would have to be pretty creative. Much as she might like the guy, I don’t think she’s got it in her to overrule the entire HOB.

Dave Wells
April 24, 2009

I don’t know, CJ. Doesn’t it constitute “abandonment of communion” to go against her wishes?

Christopher Johnson
April 24, 2009

If she wants to make the Communion Partners case for them, sure. But I think she’s smart enough to realize that Gennie’s just one guy. And the next NM nominee will be probably be just as out there as Gennie was but hopefully without an explicit connection to a non-Christian religion this time.

Floridian
April 24, 2009

Ah – but will ‘Genpo’ be deposed as was Holmes-Redding?

Jmark
April 24, 2009

Maybe it’s happened recently, but I don’t see the Bp. of Colorado listed. As he is the PBess’ lap dog, I wounder how he’ll vote. Finger in the wind, “Oh, it’s a majority NO – Well, me too.” Or, “Yes, Mistress. A YES it is.”

Fuinseoig
April 24, 2009

J.M., weirdly, I have no idea how Gene will vote. I would have said “Of course he’ll vote ‘Yes’!” but oddly enough, the guy (apart from his rock-solid convicton that the Bible is all about gay liberation) has a Christology that at least has a nodding acquaintance with orthodox belief (by which I mean, he seems to accept the divinity of Christ and though he’s famously talked about his difficulties with the Creed, hasn’t produced any variant liturgies himself), so I would not bet that he wouldn’t vote “No”.

That’s one result I’m very interested in seeing, I have to admit.

Christopher Johnson
April 24, 2009

Fuinseoig,

Keeping in mind that my Anglican prediction record has been abysmal, I would actually be very surprised if Robinson voted to approve. He constantly pictures himself as just a run-of-the-mill evangelical Christian who happens to be gay so a No vote should be the easiest thing in the world for him. His evangelical street cred goes up and the guy who follows Forrester is going to be pretty much as leftist as Forrester is anyway so it’s a win/win. On the other hand, a vote to approve Forrester would blow any of Robinson’s evangelical Christian pretensions out of the water once and for all.

See you back here Sunday.

:-)

Fuinseoig
April 24, 2009

Christopher, I’ll be ready ;-)

Christopher Johnson
April 24, 2009

F? Just make sure your Glock is loaded.

;-)

J.M. Heinrichs
April 26, 2009

“My grandfather’s glock was too large for the shelf,
So it stood ninety years on the floor …”

Cheers

Support The MCJ

Search

Links

Meta