NO NEW THING UNDER THE SUN

Monday, October 31st, 2011 | Uncategorized

If any of you believe that John Shelby Spong and the rest of the mitered atheists in TEO’s House of Squishops are modern phenomena, Kendall Harmon directs your attention to the story of Bishop William Montgomery Brown:

Some called him the Red Bishop, others the Bad Bishop, or even the Mad Bishop. But no one called Episcopalian William Montgomery Brown a boring bishop.

A Gilded-Age Ohioan educated at Kenyon’s Bexley Hall seminary, Brown cut a broad swath through life, a man of God who morphed into a man of Marx-and Darwin, too. He was the first Episcopalian bishop, and only one so far, to be tried for heresy.

Like so many others, Brown started out perfectly orthodox.

Some of the seminarians were reading Darwin at the time, but not Brown. “How foolish of them, I thought, to read such books!” he would later write in his autobiography, My Heresy. “This book was not a necessary part of our training for the ministry, and why should anybody in training for the ministry read anything that would tend to weaken his faith?”

Brown never got a degree but was ordained anyway since degrees were not required then.  He took an Ohio parish.

After three years of study, Brown left Bexley Hall. He never actually met all of the degree requirements. But a degree wasn’t actually required for the Episcopal priesthood. He was ordained and began his career at Grace Church in Galion, northwest of Gambier. There, he began to rise in ecclesiastical authority. And it would be in Galion that he later gained notoriety for his turn toward radicalism.

Let’s just say that Brown was an über-Episcopalian.

Brown devoted himself to his pastoral duties. He supervised missionary work in Ohio and lectured at Bexley Hall. But he also began to emerge as something of a militant Episcopalian. In 1895, he published The Church for Americans, a tract of nearly 500 pages arguing that every right-thinking American should join the Episcopal Church.

For completely religious reasons, mind you.

After all, he argued, many American governors, senators, and other notables were Episcopalians, among them William H. Vanderbilt, “the richest man the world had ever known.” Moreover, of the fifty-five signers of the Declaration of Independence, thirty-five were Episcopalians.

Which brought Brown to the attention of the national church.

The national church took note. In 1898, three years after the book’s publication, Brown was consecrated bishop-coadjutor for the Arkansas diocese and received an honorary Doctor of Divinity degree from Kenyon.

In order to fit in Arkansas society, Brown went what he probably thought was native.

He tried to shore up his standing-to “mend his political fences,” as Carden put it-by embracing southern attitudes toward race. In a book called The Crucial Race Question, Brown proposed strict segregation for the Episcopal Church: one autonomous but separate church for blacks, another for whites.

“Amalgamation is a ruinous crime,” he wrote. Cain’s murder of Abel, by comparison, was “a crime that was venial compared with that of miscegenation.”

Then Brown came up with an idea to unify Protestantism under the benevolent guidance of guess who.

Seeking to wield influence, drawn to ideas on a grand scale, Brown continued to cobble together visions of Christianity and political philosophy. The Ohio seminarian turned Arkansas racist now developed a scheme for a sort of church egalitarianism.

In a 1910 book, he unveiled a plan for “leveling.” The idea was that members of all Protestant denominations would select their own bishops and all would come together under the umbrella of Episcopalianism. As part of the project, Brown dropped some elements his church held dear, such as apostolic succession and a priestly class.

For the sake of his health, the egomaniac bishop returned to Ohio in 1911 and promptly went full Spong.  Because of SCIENCE!!

In Galion, Brown’s physician, apparently looking for ways to reinvigorate the bishop intellectually, suggested he read Darwin. With time to read and contemplate, Brown began to change his views.

And the change was big. “I no longer believed in a personal God, nor in a six-day creation, nor in a literal heaven and hell,” Brown wrote. No fall of man, nor a redemption through the blood of Christ, either. Creeds, he decided, were symbolical, nothing more.

Others guided him towards socialism, and he began reading Marx, too. “That was another revelation,” Brown wrote. “Darwin was now my Old Testament, Marx my New.”

A number of factors may explain this change. Perhaps Brown’s boyhood as a farmhand planted the seeds of class consciousness. Then there was his temperament. Brown was a man of “monumental hubris and desire for attention,” wrote Carden. “He chose shocking positions to gain notoriety.” In addition, the bishop was influenced by several unorthodox advisers. One was his secretary, a German minister, who introduced him to nontraditional notions of Christianity.

In 1920, Brown summarized his new philosophy in Communism and Christianism, a 247-page book urging readers to “Banish the Gods from the Skies and Capitalists from the Earth.”

Brown wrote that capitalism had failed, that “millions are insufficiently fed, clothed, housed and warmed, and are doomed to a perpetual and exhaustive drudgery which leaves neither leisure nor energy for the cultivation of their soul life.”

He called for “economic levelism,” a spreading out of wealth and new respect for the worker. “Communism is for me the one comprehensive term which is a synonym at once of morality, religion and Christianity,” he wrote.

Amazingly, there was once a time when Episcopal bishops actually had spines.

Church officials pondered their options. Eventually, three bishops, the minimum required, charged Brown with heresy. Eight like-minded bishops gathered in 1924 for a trial in Cleveland. They served as judges and jurors. And they quickly convicted him.

The Old Catholics were okay with Brown, though.

Meanwhile, the deposed bishop surprised his Episcopal detractors by gaining a new religious rank: he was consecrated a bishop of the Old Catholic Church of America, a group which had ties with Episcopalianism. Not wanting to lose his title, Brown had been searching for a church in communion with the Episcopal denomination.

And does this sound familiar?  To the end of his life, Brown attended an Episcopal church even though he no longer believed the Christian religion.

And he regularly made the walk from Brownella Cottage across the street to Grace Church. “He renounced everything about Christianity and yet he was there in church every Sunday,” Clinger said. “He even took communion. They held his funeral at the church.”

8 Comments to NO NEW THING UNDER THE SUN

William Tighe
October 31, 2011

Well, TE”C” seems to have been a considerably more “generous” organization back then, perhaps not quite so accommodating of all varieties of belief and unbelief, but nevertheless allowing Brown to continue to receive communion within its capacious bosom, and to have its funeral rites, even after he had been (re)consecrated by Old Catholic episcopi vagantes, and had founded his own church — cf.:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Montgomery_Brown

which is more than its current crop of emigres can claim. And, as I wrote on another blog,

“I am glad that you put up this posting, by the way, as I have long thought that Brown stands in the same relation to Bishop Pike as the latter does to Bishop Spong; and, again by the way, Brown’s later history was almost as bizarre as that of Pike, as he became an episcopus vagans, the founder of his own church, and a member of the Communist Party, before his death in 1937.”

Note, if you go to the Wikipedia article, the illustration of this book by Brown:

Cover art for the paperback edition of Teachings of Marx for Girls and Boys (1935).

Autre temps, autre moeurs; nowadays such “go-ahead” TE”C”cies would be more likely to produce “for Girls and Boys” guides to bisexuality or how to use a condom – but the underlying spirit is all the same.

Daniel Muller
November 1, 2011

Some Episcopal bishops burned the book

Oh, my. Autre temps, autre moeurs, indeed.

Fuinseoig
November 1, 2011

“He was the first Episcopalian bishop, and only one so far, to be tried for heresy.”

Why do I get the impression there is an unvoiced but implied “Alas!” at the end of that sentence? :-)

“Perhaps Brown’s boyhood as a farmhand planted the seeds of class consciousness.”

Hey! My mother’s father was a ploughman and my father worked on farms as a labourer before joining the Irish army and they never came up with anything as dumb as the good bishop’s vagaries!

So he went from recommending that Episcopalianism should be the national state church because a really rich guy had been an Episcopalian, to saying that capitalism was evil? No variance in attitude there!

Though I note that he invented the term “Christianism” (which would make holders of that philosophy “Christianists”) way before Andrew Sullivan started using such terms, so he truly was innovative!

Oh, the Old Catholics *eye-rolling*. They’d ordain a dogfish if anyone asked them, just to prove that they are indeed Really Truly Catholic Like A Branch Theory Branch Is, Mean Old Rome.

Thanks for this fascinating glimpse into a by-gone age, Christopher.

Allen Lewis
November 1, 2011

What!? No Nobel Peace Prize for this paragon of virtue?

He was robbed! Definitely a man before his time.

Ed the Roman
November 1, 2011

At least if a dogfish prayed, “for what I am about to receive may the Lord make me truly thankful” it would mean it.

William Tighe
November 1, 2011

Here is a quotation from *Reveries of A Hermit* by Frederick Joseph Kinsman (1936), and, specifically, from its chapter on “Anglicanism” (p. 142):

“Some years ago, a clergyman holding a prominent position in this country gave up his faith altogether. ‘Christianism is but one version of the solar myth,’ he held. With some difficulty he was deposed, the difficulty arising from from dislike of heresy trials and from unwillingness to give the case publicity. Later he addressed one of his former colleagues: “I am a condemned heretic, you presumably most orthodox; yet fundamentally we are one.” And to show this he wished the other to invite him to preach in his cathedral. The ridiculousness of this lies in the fact that in the envoronment from which the man spoke there was some sense in it. Another clergyman, condemned for heresy by Presbyterians, was later ordained in the Episcopal Church and made canon of a cathedral. A Catholic bishop, who made his acquaintance on shipboard, asked him if he would mind telling him why he, who had been too radical in his negations for the Presbyterians, had identified himself with a body, supposed to be the nearest of Protestant organizations to the Catholic Church. The clergyman replied: ‘You do not understand the Episcopal Church. It is true that it has a right wing, nearer Catholics than Protestants, but it also has a left wing going far in the other direction. What attracts me is its comprehensiveness.’”

The first section of this quotation refers to Brown; the second (beginning “Another clergyman …”) to Charles Augustus Briggs, on whom see:

http://books.google.com/books?id=Nl1sv1vP5q0C&pg=PA38&lpg=PA38#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Augustus_Briggs

Kinsman (1868-1944) was PECUSA Bishop of Delaware from 1908 to 1919, when he resigned and became a Catholic. His religious autobiography *Salve Mater* (1920) tells why.

undergroundpewster
November 1, 2011

So when will some lefty diocese propose a resolution to rehabilitate Bishop William Montgomery Brown?

Michael D
November 1, 2011

Seems these people see a Mitre as a sort of tenure – license to believe and do whatever you want.

A shallow man, easily swayed. He reads two books, Darwin and Marx, and finds a new god.

Support The MCJ

Search

Links

Meta