CAMLANN

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010 | Uncategorized

South Carolina isn’t stupid.  South Carolina knows.  But South Carolina won’t flinch:

RESOLVED, That this 219th Convention of the Diocese of South Carolina affirms its legal and ecclesiastical authority as a sovereign diocese within the Episcopal Church, and be it further

RESOLVED,  That this Convention declares the Presiding Bishop has no authority to retain attorneys in this Diocese that present themselves as the legal counsel for the Episcopal Church in South Carolina, and be it finally

RESOLVED, That the Diocese of South Carolina demands that the Presiding Bishop drop the retainer of all such legal counsel in South Carolina as has been obtained contrary to the express will of this Diocese, which is The Episcopal Church within its borders.

The Ecclesiastical Authority of the Diocese is the Bishop. If there is no Bishop, the Standing Committee is the Ecclesiastical Authority. The Ecclesiastical Authority of the Diocese, with the advice and counsel of the Chancellor, is the sole and final authority with respect to any dispute concerning the interpretation of the Constitution and Canons of this Diocese and its interpretations shall be final and binding in all respects.

Resolved, that the following Section be added to Canon XXX. 

Section 6.  “It is within the power of the Ecclesiastical Authority of this Diocese to provide a generous pastoral response to parishes in conflict with the Diocese or Province, as the Ecclesiastical Authority judges necessary, to preserve the unity and integrity of the Diocese.”

Explanation:

1. The actions of the Presiding Bishop’s office, now publicly acknowledged, have demonstrated a clear willingness and intent both to legally pursue congregations we consider parishes in good standing, and attempt to utilize diocesan resources to do so. 

2. We’ve experienced now as a diocese, in the All Saints, Pawleys Island litigation, the destructive force of such litigation; how it has created animosities and divisions that are not easily healed. It has failed as a positive cohesive force for maintaining the unity of the church and has in fact had precisely the opposite effect. Christians are suing Christians (I Cor. 6:1-8); the reputation of the church is marred, and vital resources are diverted from essential Kingdom work.  None of this is honoring to our Savior.

3. It has been the implicit understanding of this Diocese that the Bishop inherently has the authority to deal with such situations. The current practice of the Bishop to deal pastorally with parishes struggling with their relationship with the Diocese or Province must be given explicit canonical force. The discretion exercised by the bishop is the only way to successfully navigate the current challenges before us.

I’ve made it clear again and again how I feel about remaining connected to the Episcopalians.  The battle is over and the left has won so continuing to defend little bridges is not brave but spiritually suicidal.

That said, I can’t help but admire South Carolina’s stance.  I don’t know what the legal situation in that state is; the Curmudgeon is probably the go-to guy for any questions you might have in that area.

The Gamecocks might be able to hold 815 off for a while, maybe even a long while.  But they won’t hold them off forever.  After all, Mrs. Schori can muddy the waters whenever the mood strikes her.

We’ve all seen the pattern.  The Presiding Bishop will discover that Mark Lawrence has “abandoned communion,” depose him and appoint another one of her sock puppets in his place.  The Standing Committee will go next replaced by still more of her tools.

After that, Mrs. Schori will stand back and let the courts decide who the “real” Diocese of South Carolina is and, particularly important in TEO’s case, who gets to spend Diocesan money, thus effectively hamstringing any effective Anglican witness in South Carolina for years to come.

It will be painful to contemplate the possibility that such magnificent Anglican landmarks as St. Michael’s of Charleston, which I visited during my one and only trip to that most enchanting of American cities, or St. Philip’s, which I didn’t get to, might fall, if only temporarily, under the control of that loathsome cult.  But we Anglican conservatives brought this on ourselves.

And we need to keep reminding ourselves that here we have no continuing city but we seek one to come.

30 Comments to CAMLANN

Dale Matson
March 10, 2010

For an historical parallel, review the invasion of Poland by Germany 1939. The part of the Soviets is played by the ABC.

Marie Blocher
March 10, 2010

I love it that they used the same phrase “generous pastoral response”
that was so often used a couple of years back in regard to same sex union.

Truth Unites... and Divides
March 10, 2010

“The battle is over and the left has won so continuing to defend little bridges is not brave but spiritually suicidal.”

Like defending imaginary little bridges in Sodom and Gomorrah.

“That said, I can’t help but admire South Carolina’s stance.”

I don’t admire DioSC or +Lawrence. I admire +Schofield and DioSJ. Against WO. Bolted out of TEc. And got lambasted by Institutionalist-Enabler Ephraim Radner in the New York Times.

And fwiw, I admire rector Steve Wood. Anyone know what the latest news is on Rector Steve Wood and his church? He needs to protect his flock and get them out of both TEc AND the DioSC.

Goodbye PBess, goodbye Bishop Lawrence.

Dale Matson
March 10, 2010

TU&D,
Thanks for the affirmation of our Bishop JDS and Diocese. I met with him on Monday and his health is returning following heart surgery. He is full of vim and vinegar and new ideas. His enthusiasm is contagious.
He is a visionary.

Matthew
March 10, 2010

My understanding of SC law is that if 815 makes any serious efforts to interfere, they will get their butts handed to them.

Dale Matson
March 10, 2010

Matthew,
“…they will get their butts handed to them.” What other part is there?

Flambeaux
March 10, 2010

Dale,

This far into the farce and you need to ask?

:)

Grandmother
March 10, 2010

Well, the reason for the “appeal”, was that our Supreme Court ruled that the Denis Canon had no standing in this state. And the latest kerfluffle with someone here trying to “represent” TEC tried to get confidential information from our Chancellor under the guise of friendship. He was a former Diocesan Chancellor for 10 years and claimed to “represent TEC”.

If indeed this guy did represent TEC, then +Lawrence is telling TEC where to go.. LOL (in polite terms).
The churches wishing to depart are sticking with him for now. St. Andrews Mt. Pleasant will BE at the upcoming convention, and Steve+ says the resolutions NEED to pass..

Hope this helps.
Grandmother in SC

Paula Loughlin
March 10, 2010

Where is that applause button???

Ed the Roman
March 10, 2010

And when Mark Lawrence retires? Yeah, he’s young, he’s new. He’s mortal.

Who’s going to succeed him? What will the HOB look like in twenty years?

There will never be another Episcopal bishop who doesn’t like teh geh.

Minuteman
March 10, 2010

“the Loathsome Cult” :) )

Truth Unites... and Divides
March 10, 2010

“TU&D,
Thanks for the affirmation of our Bishop JDS and Diocese. I met with him on Monday and his health is returning following heart surgery. He is full of vim and vinegar and new ideas. His enthusiasm is contagious.
He is a visionary.

He had a vision of fulfilling the Great Commission which would be so much better and spiritually healthier when his flock was safely outside of TEc.

+Lawrence doesn’t.

the pilgrim
March 10, 2010

the PBess should have done a little research on South Carolinians before poking a stick into Bishop Lawrence’s cage…http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Ruffin

Michael D
March 10, 2010

And when Mark Lawrence retires?

TEC and its lawyers are worried that, before Lawrence retires, he will watch helplessly as all his precious sheep escape to join a Christian Province, through a great big legal loophole created by the SC Supreme Court.

I’m sure :) the good bishop has not thought of that.

Go little sheep! Go!

Katherine
March 10, 2010

Good to hear that Bishop Schofield’s health is improving. May God continue to bless him.

If Bishop Lawrence is able to beat back 815 in court, and he’s taking a positive step towards doing that, then the future for SC may or may not be TEC. If their power over him is only ecclesiastical, they have no power over him.

Michael D
March 10, 2010

Sasha you have odd fantasies, perhaps better left off this site.

Jackie
March 10, 2010

Chris,
I am loathe to correct a fellow blogger but I simply must point out this obvious typo:

The Standing Committee will go next replaced by still more of her tools fools.

Sasha
March 10, 2010

Probably you’re right – if that’s why my comment has been deleted (as can be seen), I don’t mind. Hopefully Google or somebody else won’t have had time to take a snapshot thereof…

It’s simply my wish that all that evil those Commies in TEO are doing would somehow or other be stopped – and no, I’ve no intention or desire to get involved in any immoral activity.

Nevertheless, it could be seriously the case that Mark Lawrence IS secretly out to have his parishes escape TEO’s clutches, which would truly be wonderful!

Truth Unites... and Divides
March 10, 2010

Michael D: “Go little sheep! Go!”

Yes. Even if +Lawrence doesn’t.

Michael D
March 10, 2010

The shepherd, of course, must be the last to leave. Like Gandalf against the Balrog, saying “fly, you fools!”

C-3PO Mary Tweedle Dee (not dumb) rocking horse Dodo Bird
March 10, 2010

The Curmudgeon has written about the TEO’s “take over” procedure at http://accurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2009/02/machiavelli-ritornato.html
.

C-3PO Mary Tweedle Dee (not dumb) rocking horse Dodo Bird
March 10, 2010

I should say litigation strategy–is there a difference?

Truth Unites... and Divides
March 11, 2010

Michael D: “The shepherd, of course, must be the last to leave.”

Has the shepherd informed the sheep that they need to leave TEc?

Michael D
March 11, 2010

TUAD: I doubt it – one must be very cautious when guarding sheep from wolves, not to give the wolves an advantage.

Why do you ask? Are you a wolf?

Truth Unites... and Divides
March 11, 2010

Michael D,

Are you a wolf-enabler?

Christian
March 11, 2010

Camlann? This South Carolinian is thinking Fort Sumter.

Allen Lewis
March 11, 2010

+Lawrence is still operating, apparently, on the belief that there is a reasonable way out for the Diocese of SC. I am afraid that he – and others in the Diocese, who did not want to face the obvious – are in for a rude awakening. The SC Supreme Court ruling in the All Saint’s Waccamaw case will be helpful, but will it be enough?

In my opinion, the Diocese will die an agonizing death because there is no united leadership which has a vision other than of “dithering” and hoping for the best.

Right now, the Diocese’s choices are very limited. I do pray for them and wish them well. It will be a sad thing to see the church in which I grew up destroyed. But I am afraid that is what is going to happen. The people who really believe in the principles of Anglicanism have left long ago. The ones which are left….

I would not go so far as my friend TU..AD, but I sense that there is a lack of real passion for the Anglican Way in most of the parishes within the diocese. Even St. Andrew’s (led by Steve Woods+) is more of an evangelical, praise ‘n’ worship entity than it is Anglican. There still is the issue of WO in the diocese. So I am not too hopeful for the future of the Anglicans in the Diocese of SC.

We can only hope and pray.

Makes me glad I left for the ACC when I did.

Truth Unites... and Divides
March 11, 2010

Allen Lewis: “In my opinion, the Diocese will die an agonizing death because there is no united leadership which has a vision other than of “dithering” and hoping for the best.”

I will go as far as my friend Allen Lewis and fully agree with him.

An undershepherd who allows his flock to “die an agonizing death” is not a good undershepherd.

C-3PO Mary Tweedle Dee (not dumb) rocking horse Dodo Bird
March 12, 2010

Regardless of what happens in the Diocese, and I am praying daily for the Diocese, the good Bishop Lawrence, and for the larger church to come to its senses, it does seem that the TEO is after a lot of pretty, but empty buildings, but no members.

William Tighe
March 13, 2010

“I don’t admire DioSC or +Lawrence.”

Neither do I, TUaD. His enemies are wolves; he’s a dog who purports to “ordain” women. Canines both; let them both go to the devil.

Leave a comment

Support The MCJ

Search

Links

Meta