COMES THE DAWN
So how's the Lambeth Conference going? Jim dandy, if you listen to the Episcopalians:
"We’re at a place in our lives now where we’re ready to start talking about the issues of life that we have in the Anglican Communion," said Diocese of Los Angeles Bishop Jon Bruno after the bishops’ retreat ended at midday on July 19.
"This retreat has set the foundation for us to build the building blocks of love, compassion, grace and understanding," he added. "The only way that that would be disabled or derailed is if people go to places within them of their own personal agendas, that they become ideological idolaters, and that they move to a place of hatred, rather than a place of love."
Double J's referring to conservatives, of course. Geralyn Wolf was as giddy as a schoolgirl.
Diocese of Rhode Island Bishop Geralyn Wolf said July 17 that “for those who like to be taken into a vision and work into that vision," the retreat’s first day was "thrilling."
"For those who like absolute answers and wish him to address the issues in the Communion, it was probably a disappointment," she added.
The LA contingent thinks conservatives should be there so they'd find out what bigots they are.
Williams challenged the bishops July 18 to seek out another bishop who made them fearful or anxious and ask that bishop to pray for them. Bishop Assistant Sergio Carranza of Los Angeles said he sought out African bishops.
"All of them were optimistic and said it’s going to be alright," he told ENS the next day. "Everybody with whom I talked is concerned we find a way to stay together, and not break communion."
Williams noted the absence of bishops who decided to boycott the Lambeth Conference due to theological disagreements with the main body of the church, asking those present to pray for them. Bruno said the few bishops who refused to come "are cheating themselves and moving to a place of cutting themselves way from the body."
"No one has pushed them out. We’re trying to envelop them," he said. "If they would only come and be part of the body, they would be enriched and maybe changed. As the archbishop said, they would be offering themselves as teacher and taught."
There's one down note. The Americans think it sucks that Robbie's not there.
Kansas Bishop Dean Wolfe said during an interview that the absence of New Hampshire Bishop Gene Robinson was palpable during the retreat, especially for his fellow bishops in the Class of 2003. "We’re a very close class," Wolfe said. "We’ve never been divided in this way. There’s a sense of absence."
Diocese of New Jersey Bishop George Councell, another member of that class, told a media briefing on July 18 that he felt "a very deep ache for my brother." He said many bishops will worship with Robinson on the afternoon of July 20 at a Eucharist in St. Stephen’s Field, about a 20-minute walk from Canterbury Cathedral where the conference’s opening Eucharist will have been held that morning.
Thus the Episcopalians. Tom Wright, on the other hand, sees an entirely different Conference than the Americans do.
The Rt Rev Tom Wright, the Bishop of Durham, has revealed that there is deep unease over the future of the communion and an atmosphere of mutual suspicion among bishops.
His comments come as about 650 bishops meet at the once-a-decade Lambeth conference in Canterbury, with continuing division over the issue of homosexuality.
Bishop Wright, a senior figure in the Church hierarchy, expressed concern that the summit was lacking direction and admitted that the Anglican Church was in a mess. "All sorts of forces have built up over the years in the communion through misunderstanding and people doing things differently without really consulting," he said."Sooner or later this was all going to meet and hit the buffers. It’s been like a slow-moving train wreck."
The bishop, who is highly respected and a close friend of the Archbishop of Canterbury, told The Sunday Telegraph that the presence of American bishops involved in the consecration of Gene Robinson, the first openly homosexual Anglican bishop, was proving divisive.
"A lot of people here have a lot of questions about why the American bishops are here," he said. "Those questions are in the room."Around 250 bishops, mainly from Africa, have boycotted the conference in protest at Dr Rowan Williams’s decision to invite the American bishops, whom they hold responsible for causing the schism. Organisers have drawn up an agenda lacking any major votes or debates in the hope that it will limit conflict.
But Bishop Wright said that there was mistrust between the different factions over who was going to make the next significant move. "It’s like a very odd game of cards," he said. "We’re all being very civil and talking politely, but people are wondering who is going to play which card next and hence what responses may be possible."
Bishop Wright added that the summit was lacking direction and questioned how effective it would be.
"There’s a sense that we’re all not quite sure where this is going. That’s the mood of the conference. It is gloriously confusing at the moment and slightly worrying in that one has no idea what’s actually going on."
So who's right? In a way, both are. The Americans know that Dr. Williams has structured the Conference so that the most pressing issue facing the Anglican Communion will not be addressed. The Americans also know that they will have a free hand effective immediately since their "official" Anglican standing is safe for another ten years. So the Episcopalians can hallucinate any kind of Conference they like.
Bishops like Dr. Wright, on the other hand, who claim to have been shocked by the American and Canadian actions of 2003, may finally be coming to the realization that Rowan Williams has structured this Conference so that the Americans and Canadians will get away with it. And they may realize that, Anglican Covenant or no Anglican Covenent, the controversy is not going to go away. Indeed, it will probably get even worse.
GAFCON recently declared the Covenant proposal currently on the table to be dead-on-arrival. And Tom Wright's smart enough to know that a Covenant will not and cannot stop people like Mrs. Schori. So maybe, just maybe, somebody's finally put some coffee on that institutional conservatives can smell.

Submitted by Ken
at 7/19/2008 9:47:18 PM| Well, the Episcopalians clearly think they are winning. However, heretics and Americans tend to be arrogant, so they have a double-dose of hubris, which makes one stupid (stupified might be a more accurate term). OTOH, Bp. Wright made his bed and gets no sympathy from me. Lie down with the dogs, get up with the fleas. |

Submitted by Sasha
at 7/19/2008 10:10:01 PM| You know, ladies & gentlemen: Why should we bother any more with this "Anglican Communion"?? It has already met its ignominious death thanks to the detritus of "Western Civilisation" that seems out to kill itself by its espousing values no people can survive with in the long-term (abortion, homosexuality, disrespect - and even HATE!!! - for Our Lord, contempt for the family and for our fellow-men, total interest merely in self-aggrandisement at everybody else's expense)! That's why we're forced to bring in people from Islâmic and other nations to staff our work-forces - and then they expect us to submit to them!!! If we don't put all those creeps in their places and evict those people whose values are against ours, we'll have only ourselves to blame when the persecution starting against us becomes so unbearable that we end up dying either by their hands or even (in some cases) our own... Truly, I'm convinced that the End-Times and Great Tribulation are upon us!!! We must pray that God will end this time before we're ALL exterminated to the last man, woman and child!!!! And otherwise, we have to set up our own churches (without tax-exemptions, in VERY small groups perhaps - most certainly being unadulteratedly Biblical, not tolerating deviation from what the Bible, the Church-Fathers and early Councils have advocated, and not allowing the aberrant anti-Christians to dictate to us what we can do or believe!!). Under these circumstances, when we won't be able to even trust our relatives or closest friends, we'll have to trust God - and Him ALONE!!! [Then having any sort of "communion" may prove to be extra-elusive if we have to watch who may inform on us and worse...] If there is such a thing as a "Rapture" (something I'm NOT convinced of as being present at all!), then let's pray that it happen with us all ASAP. Yours truly is extremely frightened for the future... |

Submitted by JM
at 7/19/2008 10:27:04 PM| It appears that the Piskies have scored some primo ganja. I doubt they would share any with the African bishops, anyway, so the Africans didn't miss much by staying away. Besides, if you're that much into fantasy and science fiction, I think a Star Trek convention would be a lot more fun. |

Submitted by SInner
at 7/19/2008 10:30:28 PM| "A lot of people here have a lot of questions about why the American bishops are here," he said. "Those questions are in the room."
Precisely. And those "questions" can be thrown out! Thrown into the fire and burned. That is the only solution to this problem. But Bishop Wright said that there was mistrust between the different factions over who was going to make the next significant move. GAFCON has made the significant move. The first and the last significant move. The covenant is dead; the Canterbury communion is dead; and you have a few weeks to decide to go to GAFCON or to Rome before you are declared apostate, your diocese smashed into a mission field, your parishes owning their allegiance to Christ and to a true Christian bishop. FiF/UK is preparing to move next week... Choose now, "Bishop" Tom |

Submitted by diane
at 7/19/2008 11:07:30 PM| Well, I would comment on all of this, but I am too preoccupied right now with being taken into a vision and working into that vision. Especially the latter. Can't get too passive with that vision stuff. |

Submitted by ann r
at 7/20/2008 1:33:23 AM| I wonder if the U.S. contingent might be a bit naive about how British intellectuals express themselves. They can be very very polite and at the same time be considering you as beneath their notice. I can imagine standard expressions of politeness appropriate to a cultured class might appear to some of our group as love, respect and agreement. In some cases it might be. In others not. Have to wait and see! |

Submitted by Whitestone
at 7/20/2008 2:44:40 AM| Bruno: "they become ideological idolaters"
This is incredulous from a man whose pseudo-religious cabal's idealogy trumps Jesus Christ and Scripture and is trying to take over a global Church. |

Submitted by LaVallette
at 7/20/2008 2:50:30 AM| Meanwhile: In Sydney, Australia, something about a WYD.!!! |

Submitted by saint
at 7/20/2008 6:22:18 AMGreat post Christopher. Highlights the cognitive dissonance or rather highlights the full court press by the Americans to stay on message [ie. (a) seat Gene (b)give the Anglican franchise in the U.S. to the Episcopal Church, and (c) stop those damn Africans, with this being part of the play for (a)], all while ignoring all the elephants in the big blue circus tent. While there is much to like about Thomas Dunhelm, I've also enjoyed watching him squirm recently. Glad to see he still manages to mention Iraq in everything he says. |

Submitted by saint
at 7/20/2008 6:42:36 AM| BTW LaVallete, apart from our usual snarky media and the loons that populate their letters/feedback forums and their blogs, WYD has been wonderful. It's been a joy to have the Pope and all the Catholic pilgrims on our shores. This morning's mass was the biggest gathering in Australian history (although despite two superb cantors, and the wonderful Fijian gospel procession - I can understand why some Catholics complain about liturgical music being a dog's dinner even if that apparently was one of the better efforts) |

Submitted by PNP, OP
at 7/20/2008 7:03:22 AM| “for those who like to be taken into a vision and work into that vision..." Isn't this what Lucifer said to his demonic minions? Fr. Philip, OP |

Submitted by Ken
at 7/20/2008 7:50:01 AM| Off-topic: First Things has some interesting comments on TEC, and Bishop Kate specifically in the the current issue. Fortunately, they put it online: The Death of Protestant America: A Political Theory of the Protestant Mainline |

Submitted by Tregonsee
at 7/20/2008 8:52:25 AM| The Anglican Communion is dead. Long live the GAFCON communion! |

Submitted by Sparky
at 7/20/2008 8:55:08 AM| Sasha, You commented: "And otherwise, we have to set up our own churches (without tax-exemptions, in VERY small groups perhaps" New, small churches can obtain tax exempt status w/o formal ties to TEC or another "hierarchical" church. |

Submitted by The Little Myrmidon
at 7/20/2008 9:24:59 AM| They are making a god of the Anglican Communion. I especially liked, "... It’s been like a slow-moving train wreck." My husband and I are finding more authentic preaching at the local Congregational (NACCC) Church. Yeah, we miss the liturgy, but the message is great. |

Submitted by st. anonymous
at 7/20/2008 9:53:18 AM| "So maybe, just maybe, somebody's finally put some coffee on that institutional conservatives can smell." I can smell something all right, but it ain't coffee... |

Submitted by Fr. J.
at 7/20/2008 10:11:19 AM| Sinner said: GAFCON has made the significant move. The first and the last significant move. The covenant is dead; the Canterbury communion is dead; and you have a few weeks to decide to go to GAFCON or to Rome before you are declared apostate, your diocese smashed into a mission field, your parishes owning their allegiance to Christ and to a true Christian bishop. I am sympathetic, but please do not set yourselves up for a disappointment. I don't see CofE dioceses being "smashed." Many have explained why there wont be many going to Rome. And, I doubt many will choose GAFCON over Canterbury. Anglicans are an odd lot and always have been. They are not confined to logic. In fact, they have always been bound to one another by their agreement to disagree. I don't see many Brits abandoning their great Cathedrals and Canterbury to attach themselves to a headless "Jerusalem." The Church has always been built around persons (Archbishops, bishops, and even the pope), not events like GAFCON. And the CCP is another headless mongrel that cant really be a church. I just don't see throngs of people moving from a CofE, which though in error stands on plausible historic footing, to an amorphous entity that is perhaps even more divided on WO. I just don't see many moving from the mush of the AC to the even mushier mush of GAFCON. |

Submitted by Fr. J.
at 7/20/2008 10:24:43 AM| Sinner, I should add what I do see happening. The CofE will exercise its modern role not of leadership but followership and simply adopt the errors of TEC as it has done in the past. It will take some time, but less than 10 years for dozens of VGRs to sit on the ancient episcopal thrones of England. There wont be much of a shake-up over it because frankly there just arent many left in the CofE to really care. The CofE will just mirror the spirit of the age and that will be that. So the insititution will continue to gradually move from a collection of people to a collection of empty buildings which will make very fine museums, community centers and mosques. But it will all be very gradual and virtually painless like death in ones sleep. If there is a Christian future for England, it will belong to Catholics and whatever evangelical remnant survives the lack of oxygen in the CofE. Perhaps the Baptists will see some resurgence. I could be wrong. |

Submitted by Mark Windsor
at 7/20/2008 12:02:59 PM| The CofE will just mirror the spirit of the age and that will be that. This is, perhaps, the most depressing statement of all... |

Submitted by midwestnorwegian
at 7/20/2008 12:09:12 PM| Not only does TEC know that nothing will be decided, they will return back to the States proclaiming that since nothing was decided then our actions have now been blessed. Carry on...David Beers....GET BUSY!!! |

Submitted by Fr. J.
at 7/20/2008 12:21:23 PM| Saint said: This morning's mass was the biggest gathering in Australian history WYD Toronto .8M--Largest gathering in Canadian history John Paul's funeral, 4M--Largest gathering in European history WYD Manila 6M--Largest gathering in Filipino history |

Submitted by saint
at 7/20/2008 1:26:23 PM| But...but....I just noticed V. Gene crying on his blog that his own bishops won't talk to him (and gosh is there a MAN left anywhere in the Anglican Communion). Yep Fr. J. - and there were 350K people including my parents who came out impromptu in my home town to greet the Beatles. In 1964 |

Submitted by saint
at 7/20/2008 1:42:20 PM| So it's gonna be close! Question for this morning's papers here in Iz: is the Pope a rock star or what? |

Submitted by ann r
at 7/20/2008 3:19:35 PM| In Revelation there is evidently a church left on earth through the troubles that seems to be unfaithful to Christ. Maybe that's the role of TE organization and CofE. They will still be around applauding the Lord of the World and his minions, and calling themselves a "church". |

Submitted by Dr. Mabuse
at 7/20/2008 5:53:30 PM| Fr. J.: "But it will all be very gradual and virtually painless like death in ones sleep." I expect you're right. It will be like the end of 'The Last Battle', where a small group of loyal and faithful Christians will leap joyfully to declare their allegiance, like the dogs, and the rest will stand uneasily on the sidelines, afraid to move. And then, as the night progresses, they will just slip away one by one into the shadows under the trees and go home without participating in the fight. |

Submitted by Allen Lewis
at 7/20/2008 6:46:39 PM"This retreat has set the foundation for us to build the building blocks of love, compassion, grace and understanding," he added. "The only way that that would be disabled or derailed is if people go to places within them of their own personal agendas, that they become ideological idolaters, and that they move to a place of hatred, rather than a place of love." I guess he means that the people who disagree with his viewpoint have moved to a place of agenda and hate. Because we all know that Bishop Bruno just loves to do the will of the Lord Jesus Christ and would never think of having any agenda other than the Lord's agenda! Yeah, right! |

Submitted by Sasha
at 7/20/2008 11:00:49 PM| Off-topic but perhaps somewhat-related: how on earth did those thrice-accursed "hippies" get their start into becoming so anti-establishment, anti-everything their forefathers had so believed in and cared for? Did this start only once they got to university, or were they already going bad in their school-years?!?? If "Woodstock" happened in 1968, when did things start to become visible? Then or earlier? Truly, the more I learn of what has become since Western Civilisation's last triumphs with the World Wars, the more uneasy I become... Many thanks in advance!!! |

Submitted by JM
at 7/21/2008 12:18:00 AM| "This retreat has set the foundation for us to build the building blocks of love, compassion, grace and understanding," he added. "The only way that that would be disabled or derailed is if people go to places within them of their own personal agendas, that they become ideological idolaters, and that they move to a place of hatred, rather than a place of love." Or if some boor smuggled in a Bible and started reading from it. |











Said the spider to the fly.
The Piskies are going to be excited about any day that doesn't include them and their heresies as the centerpiece of discussion. They're just running out the clock.