ONE TRUE CHURCHES
Back at Lil Slice O' Goofy, the Rev. J. G. Pennington of Ypsilanti, Michigan doesn't really care what a bunch of schismatics think about women as bishops, thank you very much:
Anglicans need to ignore concerns of the RCs who have had every possible opportunity for reconciliation with their brothers and sisters in Christ. Throughout all of the ecumenical conversations the bottom line is always to recognize the Pope’s authority and make some kind of submission to his office. It will never happen and it was never true of the early church. The desire for power over service is too strong to really effectively reconcile itself with others. Anglicans have the fullness of the faith and should move on in the faith of the renewing Holy Spirit. Women in all aspects of the ordained ministries harnesses at least 50% of Christian resources.
Kind of makes a person wonder why tens of thousands of people can't get away from the American and Canadian branches fast enough but, once again, mysterious ways and all that.

Submitted by Kozaburo
at 7/18/2008 12:15:55 AM| Hey, if you don't think Anglicans have "the fullness of faith", then you wouldn 't listen to this guy anyway, right? |

Submitted by The Pilgrim
at 7/18/2008 3:05:33 AM"It will never happen and it was never true of the early church." Not true of the early church? Sheesh. I'll say it again: This is what you get when your theology comes from a Jack Chick comic. |

Submitted by The Pilgrim
at 7/18/2008 3:09:57 AMTo paraphrase Frederica Mathewes-Green: "Some people think the early Church sat around in their jeans, talking about what a cool guy Jesus was." |

Submitted by LaVallette
at 7/18/2008 4:10:47 AM| This is just so typical of Anglo Saxon and Anglican Pride and of their out of date colonial mentality: The Church of England was made in England, the Brits are God's own Chosen people and everybody else is a child of a lesser god. Is there something about Pride being a sin or has the New Revelation got rid of that too among many others? |

Submitted by Katherine
at 7/18/2008 4:41:28 AM| Not interested in another long discussion of the ancient church. Most of us know where the various people stand here. However, for this Pennington guy to claim that TEC as it exists today has "the fullness of the faith" is risible. What faith does he mean? |

Submitted by Matthew
at 7/18/2008 4:56:27 AM| Katherine, faith in itself. The Episcopal Church has a very high opinion of itself. I agree, to the extent that I think that as a church, it is full. Of something. ;) Of course his statistics are wrong. If you are looking at attendance, women in the church comprise 60%+ of available resources, in his terms. Which raises another point. Intelligence agencies discuss people as 'assets' because they wish to dehumanize them. It makes sending them into certain death easier. Calling people resources suggests that they are there to be mined, not ministered to. But why would a minister wish to dehumanize his congregation? The Episcopal Church: Our reality will outweird your surreality any day of the week. |

Submitted by Zach Frey
at 7/18/2008 5:35:08 AMFirst Adrian, now Ypsilanti ... really, I don't think there's something in the water here in southeast Michigan. Ah, yes, St. Luke's. From their own history: I haven't set foot in St. Luke's in some time, but last I knew, harmony and diversity had been achieved. The parish contains a wide variety of opinions, from liberal to flamingly radical. And of course, if you hang a rainbow flag out front and keep congratulating yourself about how all are welcome that must make it true, right? Pay no attention to that bit of triumphalism showing -- only wrong-thinking people will be bothered by it, and while all are welcome, there have to be some limits, don't there? God have mercy. peace, |

Submitted by Annalucia
at 7/18/2008 7:43:19 AM| This reminds me of the wonderful ``1066 And All That'' wherein the Pope and his followers secede from the Church of England over the matter of Henry VIII's divorce from Katherine of Aragon.
I wonder if the Rev. Pennington read the book and took it for sober history? |

Submitted by William Tighe
at 7/18/2008 8:24:12 AM| So "it was never true of the early church" eh? This guy really nails his knowledge to the fence by his "never." He ought at least to read a few Anglican works on the papacy, works like H. E. Symonds' *The Church Universal and the See of Rome* (1939), T. G. Jalland's very subtle and detailed *The Church and the Papacy* (1944), Gregory Dix's "papalist" (and posthumous) *Jurisdiction in the Early Church: Episcopal and Papal* (1975) or the more sceptical take found in the final two chapters of Eric Mascall's *The Recovery of Unity* (1958). One can derive different conclusions from these sources, nut never "never." But, then, who expects subtlety from the inept acolytes of the Ministry of Propaganda? |

Submitted by diane
at 7/18/2008 8:59:20 AM| Off-topic, Dr. Tighe, but can you recommend some good scholarly resources on the history of Celtic Christianity? My older son is very interested in this. He has picked up a lot of silly misinformation from the Internet, and he (and his mom) would like some more reliable info. Thanks in advance!!
Diane |

Submitted by Mark Windsor
at 7/18/2008 9:05:04 AM| Yeah, yeah, yeah...It's all our fault. Those guys that met in Jerusalem recently, the Catholics did it. Some people get upset because of women bishops, the Catholics stirred that pot too. TUAD doesn't like womens ordination, he's obviously a plant from Opus Dei. All because they wouldn't let Henry VIII marry the ONE TRUE LOVE of his earthly life. Yada, yada, yada... |

Submitted by Decani
at 7/18/2008 10:20:55 AM| Matthew: Your answer of course, as Chris always reminds us, is that TEC has become TEO. I often ask HR people the same question. Why in the world would you change the name of your department from Personnel (which at least SOUNDS as if you might be interested in your employees' welfare to Human Resources (which makes it clear you are not)? |

Submitted by Gregg the Obscure_
at 7/18/2008 10:25:15 AM| This fellow apparently believes that humans are the only "Christian resources". What would he have said to "I can do all things through Him who strengthens me"? |

Submitted by Daniel Muller
at 7/18/2008 10:38:00 AM| Why in the world would you change the name of your department from Personnel (which at least SOUNDS as if you might be interested in your employees' welfare to Human Resources (which makes it clear you are not)?
|

Submitted by Sinner
at 7/18/2008 11:39:35 AM| You know, I still think it is a pity the NIgerians did not come to Lambeth. Because clearly - with Chane calling the Chair of the Primates' Council Demonic - had they been there, this could and would have been resolved in a very classically Anglican way. The Nigerians travel on diplomatic passports. That means they are subject only to the laws of their own country, and not subject to the laws of any other country - including England. The best the UK could do would be to render them persona non grata, and expel them - and as long as they had comitted no crime in a Nigerian jurisdiction, well no crime would have been committed. So, I see it this way - the Hammer of God and his 300 bishops surround the TEC bishops and physically remove them from the communion. Then they leave the UK And then the true classical Anglican discipline has been exercised, and the communion is saved. |

Submitted by Truth Unites... and Divides
at 7/18/2008 11:48:05 AM| Rev. Pennington: "Anglicans need to ignore concerns of the RCs who have had every possible opportunity for reconciliation with their brothers and sisters in Christ. Throughout all of the ecumenical conversations the bottom line is always to recognize the Pope’s authority and make some kind of submission to his office. It will never happen and it was never true of the early church. The desire for power over service is too strong to really effectively reconcile itself with others." Hardy, har, har. Hah, hah, hah, hah. That is hysterically good. This fellow is simply astonished as to why Roman Catholics have failed to accept the generous and loving graciousness, and the inclusiveness, diversity, and tolerance of revisionist Anglicans. These attributes are warmly exhibited in Rev. Pennington's comments. Hie thee hence! RCs into loving reconciliation with Rev. Pennington, and you too will share in the richness and fullness of the revisionist Anglican faith. Now don't stampede all over each other. Just proceed orderly to your nearest TEc parish. And tell them Rev. Pennington sent you. |

Submitted by Daniel Muller
at 7/18/2008 12:42:54 PM| It seems that Pennington will be bagging three soon. If the UCC does not get them first. |

Submitted by The young fogey
at 7/18/2008 12:46:02 PM| Funny how the renewing Holy Spirit never disagrees with modern received opinion (upper-middle-class mores) in any way. |

Submitted by Katherine
at 7/18/2008 12:55:58 PM| Well, but you know Modern Received Opinion is Scientific and Enlightened. Of course the Spirit agrees. (These people aren't following the Holy Sprit, but that other one.) Our host has a big day to look forward to next week. According to an item at Virtue's site, all of the bishops and their wives are gong to be rounded up from the Big Top Circus and paraded around the streets of London next Thursday in support of the MIllennium Development Goals. Global Poverty will instantly vanish. |

Submitted by Dale Price
at 7/18/2008 12:58:32 PM| Oh, we've blown our last chance at reconciliation, have we? Darn. Must have slept through all those TEO ultimata.
Progressives are just so cute when they get all anathema-y. |

Submitted by Mark
at 7/18/2008 1:57:58 PM| diane - while I'm sure WT will have a better answer eventually, the current Wikipedia article on Celtic Christianity actually looks to be quite good, so I would expect the materials in the Bibliography there to be decent.
It's quite interesting to compare the current, excellent article there to the first version, which began, "Celtic Christianity is a modern revival of what is believed to be a more spiritually free form of Christianity abandoned after the Synod of Whitby enforced Roman Catholicism as the standard form of Christianity in the British Isles." |

Submitted by Ken
at 7/18/2008 2:25:47 PM| Modern Received Opinion is Scientific and Enlightened MoROSE, eh?. The Boston Globe's headline is fradulent. These silly women will be ordained to nothing. They are religious frauds, just as the Globe is a journalistic fraud. |

Submitted by Zach Frey
at 7/18/2008 2:32:41 PMMark, It's because of our award-winning water tower">award-winning water tower.
peace, |

Submitted by Mrs. Lawrence
at 7/18/2008 2:42:52 PM| *sigh* It's official. The Stepford Wives has taken over the Episcopal priesthood.... |

Submitted by Kasia
at 7/18/2008 3:28:43 PM| Good grief, Zach - how have I lived over 30 years in southeastern Michigan and never known about that water tower??! |

Submitted by Mark P. Shea
at 7/18/2008 3:29:43 PM| Zach: A suitable totem for the Episcopal communion, unfortunately. |

Submitted by bob
at 7/18/2008 3:41:34 PM| If they have the fullness, what would the emptiness look like? |

Submitted by Truth Unites... and Divides
at 7/18/2008 4:19:20 PM| Rev. Pennington: "Anglicans need to ignore concerns of the RCs who have had every possible opportunity for reconciliation with their brothers and sisters in Christ." Well, there are some revisionist Catholics who will join the revisionist Anglicans in voting for Obama. (Revisionist Anglicans support TEc being a supporter and representative of the Religious Coalition of Reproductive Choice) "Yet today Catholics around the country are lining up to endorse Barack Obama’s candidacy for president of the United States. They are stumping hard for Obama, who, if elected, has promised to do whatever he can to appoint justices and support legislation guaranteeing decades of protection for Roe v. Wade. Who are these Catholics? They are an eclectic bunch, from politicians like Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), Democratic Governor Tim Kaine (Va.), Democratic Governor Bill Richardson (N.M.), Representative Patrick Kennedy (D-Mass.), Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.), and Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) to Dan Rooney, owner of the Pittsburgh Steelers football team. Read the rest at Roman Catholics for Obama '08 |

Submitted by Fuinseoig
at 7/18/2008 6:08:49 PM| As a proud Celtic Christian in an ancient diocese under the spiritual patronage of St. Declan (who evangelised us instead of St. Patrick doing the job), I refuse to bow my neck to the yoke of a foreign prelacy based in Ypsilanti imposing its Continental rigourousness upon my native traditions and attempting to bind us to authoritarian, centralised ecclesiastical structures! :-) |

Submitted by diane
at 7/18/2008 10:02:29 PM| Mark--thanks very much. LOL, I love that "spiritually free" bit. Does that mean dancing around oak trees at the full moon?
Fuinseoig--ROTFL! |

Submitted by Ed the Roman
at 7/19/2008 7:16:52 AM| Matthew, Intelligence agencies refer to target country nationals working for them as assets. It is not usually used for their own intelligence officers (an "agent" actually means one of the target country nationals as well). One's own officers are more likely to deliberately put at risk; agencies want the reputation of not exposing their foreign sources to any more danger than is inherent in passing your own government's secret information. |

Submitted by Albert
at 7/19/2008 10:19:04 AM| The Rev. Pennington might be surprised that the early Church banned women from even entering the sanctuary much less presiding. Then there is that epistle of St. Paul commanding that 50% of the church's resources to keep silent in church. Perhaps he should actually read the early Church prior to making comments. |

Submitted by Maureen
at 7/19/2008 5:46:08 PM| Make sure you tell your kid all about the whole staying awake all night while fasting and walking around/standing around barefoot. :) I've always found the Old Irish poem about one's mind wandering in church a very comforting reminder of how little human nature changes. |

Submitted by Phallic
at 7/21/2008 3:19:06 PM| Is it just me or does that tower resemble a ____? Circumci... |










