EQUAL TIME
I pile on leftist Episcopal goofballs a lot here so it's only fair that leftist Catholic goofballs occasionally get some attention. Don't want 'em to feel left out.
Via Uncle Di comes word of a recent West Coast conference of a LibCat group named Call to Action. How prog are these people? There's a link to an article by Spong on their web site. And the concluding service(unlike Di, I won't dignify this by calling it a liturgy) started off with a Buddhist meditation "to set mood for Mass."
But wait, there's more. Somebody thought it would be a good idea to make a video of this thing. According to Di, if you can last longer than the first couple of minutes, "your stomach is stronger than mine." I actually found it funny but I'm used to liturgical abominations.
If you want to watch this, a word of warning. It contains liturgical dancing. I don't know about you but I would prefer to have the celebrant repeatedly hit me over the head with a crucifix than to have to endure women(and men in this particular case) prancing up and down the aisles of the worship space.
But that's just me. Anyhoo, this video contains one feature that has to put it in the conversation for inclusion on the list of all-time greatest worship atrocities.
Giant papier-mâché puppets of doom.
UPDATE: For those of you who haven't been able to see the giant papier-mâché puppets of doom in action yet(since the original link is now dead) but still want to, somebody posted edited highlights at YouTube.

Submitted by obituary
at 5/7/2008 7:30:54 PM| Each to his or her or its own but at least they could have robed the poor altar boy in something decent. And the temple prostitutes were rather second rate. Otherwise it is just another example of scatterbrains trying to attract the young. Good luck. You may attract but you have to keep them you know. Oh and how many of your congreation will never be back, or have long since quit attending? (This has been a negative comment by "obituary" brought to you by the Anglican Whiners Unlimited Association) |

Submitted by Fuinseoig
at 5/7/2008 7:39:45 PM| *is stunned* Holy Mother of God. That's the sloppiest way to dress an altar that I've ever had the misfortune to worship. And the les said about the lepers and their "social diseases", the better. The puppets... were the puppets concelebrating whatever this thing was?!?!! And I'm pretty sure you shouldn't do that with a thurible, never mind the poncing around with the Book of the Gospels.It also raises a very interesting question: I'm nearly almost persuaded that the hosts were invalid matter, because they looked to me more like chapatis, but maybe just technically they were kosher (if you'll pardon the term). However, if the wine was wine (and I was thrown by the difference in colour between the stuff in either set of carafes - one pair was darker than the other, so I was wondering if one set was wine and one set was maybe grape juice or similar for children/alcoholics/non-drinkers?) - anyway, if it was wine, then could this be a case where the Precious Blood was validly consecrated but the Body was not? Is that possible? (I know that the Body and Blood cannot be separated, so receiving under either species, you receive both, but that's not the question). If the bread was invalid matter, but the wine was valid, then could we have the wine consecrated but not the bread? Any theologians want to take that puppy on?Those puppets... I will never, ever, ever again complain about the Mass in my local parish church. Even if the altar has been wreckovated to look like a bundle of sticks. |

Submitted by The Little Myrmidon
at 5/7/2008 7:44:52 PM| If anything, this congregation looks older than most in TEC. Bet they feel really hip. And what, pray tell, was wrong with the original words to this hymn? |

Submitted by Fuinseoig
at 5/7/2008 7:48:44 PM| Just to clear matters up for the non-Catholics (and at this stage, given this example, how I envy you, my separated brethren): there's a photo-gallery on the website, one of which is captioned "Leo Keegan keynote on Vatican II liturgy followed by Vatican II liturgy". People, that was not a Vatican II liturgy! Laity reading the Gospels? Lay homilist? The very suspect Eucharistic elements? The "Creator, Redeemer, Sanctifier" stuff? However bad you may think the 'Novus Ordo' is (and I'd disagree that it's all that bad), it is nowhere near that bad. About the Buddhist meditation to kick it off: it looks from the picture like they had a Singing Bowl. I'm very partial to the Singing Bowl; if they'd stuck with thirty or forty minutes of that, I'd be waaaay happier about this. Heck, if they'd gone the whole hog and had a complete Buddhist ritual (Tibetan or not), I'd be way happier. |

Submitted by Ken
at 5/7/2008 7:49:23 PM| It's fair, Christopher... It's fair. I couldn't make the video work, but I don't need to. I ended up at one of these things once (don't ask; long story). The "mass" started in the morning and was interspersed with various activities. Fortunately, we were at a nice riverside encampment sort of place, the weather was lovely, so I just went and played in the river. Oh, the gray hairs! |

Submitted by Therese Z
at 5/7/2008 8:22:05 PM| I can remember the leading edge of these awfulnesses in the 1970's, the first tentative steps. The "let's all sit in a circle around a low table and incorporate elements of the Japanese tea ceremony because that's, like, really peaceful. AND we can sing songs that we can, like, relate to. AND hold hands and embrace because that's the real sign of community, breaking the boundaries of age and sex and race. And let's make our own bread and brew our own wine even if we only have a few days, a jug and a balloon....we can meditate on the whiteness of wheat improving into the brownness of the loaf...." I don't think we said "like" that much back then, but we were probably on the leading edge of that, too. Sorry now that I didn't leap up and wreak havoc all around me at the time, I feel responsible. But the people doing this all seemed so well educated, so hip, so relevant. Glad you brought this to the blog, Chris. We needed the humility through humiliation. |

Submitted by CarolynP
at 5/7/2008 8:24:06 PM| I thought it was interesting that the congregation did not stand for the cross, but they did for the priest. Is that the usual custom in a Catholic church? I'm on our altar guild - very grateful that noone expects us to dress the altar in that manner!! |

Submitted by PNP, OP
at 5/7/2008 8:33:52 PM| This is NOT a Vatican II liturgy. This is an example of a Baby Boomer circus-event used to celebrate the great god, Self. I am so embarrassed for these people that I'm going to have to break open that 12 yr old bottle of bourbon I've been saving and toast Pope Benedict XVI for giving us "Summorum pontificum." Oh, and someone needs to report these folks to the police for abusing that poor little boy. Fr. Philip, OP |

Submitted by Fuinseoig
at 5/7/2008 8:45:45 PM| CarolynPat, if any of this can be taken as "the usual custom in a Catholic church", I'm running screaming out the door right this second :-) As to what was going on, or supposed to be going on, since it bears no resemblance whatsoever to any ceremony I've ever seen, I can't tell you why they did what they did. Ordinarily, when the celebrant of a Catholic Mass processes to the altar, he comes from the sacristy with the acolytes but without a crucifer, and the people stand up. Whenever there is a procession up the aisle with a cross-bearer etc., (and that's only on certain occasions), then people do stand up also. I liked the candles. The one authentic thing. And the bishop (holy sweet divine, he was a BISHOP!!!!) was vested correctly. And although the prancing dancers sprinkling everyone with what I presume was Holy Water out of water jugs didn't use aspergillums (aspergilla? what's the plural?), I'm cool with using the greenery since that's an old rural Irish custom for Masses in the house. We provided sops of straw or sprigs from the cypress tree for the priest to use when he came to give Holy Communion to my bed-ridden grandmother, and that was back in the 60s with a very, very conservative orthodox old-time priest. So that I can't object to, since it's the only thing I recognise as a legitimate cultural artifact. Otherwise... in the immortal words of Joseph Conrad's "The Heart of Darkness", 'The horror! The horror!'. |

Submitted by Fuinseoig
at 5/7/2008 8:48:58 PM| This does make me wonder: you linked to the Trinity Episcopal Clown Whatsit, Christopher. Is there some kind of secret liturgical arms race on to see who can scrape the bottom of the barrel even lower? If we mackerel-snappers do this, then what will you Piskies come up with in response? ;-) |

Submitted by too smart to go there, too old to care
at 5/7/2008 8:51:56 PM| That old fool should know better. Why were all those people joining in saying the consecration? That whole thing was just stupid. How tacky can you get? Can you imagine taking a child to that freak show and then having to deal with the nightmares for the next couple of weeks? Oh, boy, I guess I've just lived too long - and too well. My elementary school's programs are better done that sham. Even the clown thing had more class than this thing. Where'd they dig up those antediluvian retards anyway? The must not get out of the home much. Hey, Obit, I want to join your Anglican Whiners Unlimited Association. Where do I sign up. |

Submitted by Kekn
at 5/7/2008 9:12:05 PM| At least it wasn't a Barney mass. Though it might as well have been... |

Submitted by Ken
at 5/7/2008 9:15:56 PM| Well that didn't go to the right place. Here's a blog with all sorts of links about it. If I screw this up, just google "barney mass". |

Submitted by Allen Lewis
at 5/7/2008 9:32:04 PM| I just found it pretentious and silly, but that is just me, I guess. Nothing "worshipful" about this "liturgy" at all! |

Submitted by
at 5/7/2008 9:40:47 PM| Thanks, Chris...looks like the grass isn't that much greener across the Tiber. Maybe the future Pope Benedict XVI wrote the folks in Plano such an encouraging note because he wishes he could join them and get away from the kooks and spooks hiding in his own henhouse. Got any wierd Orthodox or Lutheran videos to share with us? |

Submitted by mcmlxix
at 5/7/2008 9:47:10 PM| Utterly contrived...
...as in Stuart from Mad TV saying "look what I cab do" and having a spasm... ...how much creative energy went into that contrivance, I don't know, but I'm sure that the talent would have been better spent in feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting the imprisoned, etc... ...silly "peace and justice" types. |

Submitted by Jeffersonian_
at 5/7/2008 9:49:00 PM| I actually snorted I laughed so hard. Please tell me there was a band of gangsters holding weapons on these poor people, forcing to act in such a disgraceful fashion. I can't imagine being part of such a farce. |

Submitted by Christopher Johnson
at 5/7/2008 9:59:53 PM| Fuinseoig,
Don't get me wrong, this was truly great horrifyingly awful "worship." I'm going to see those giant heads in my sleep. But you snackeral mappers have a ways to go yet before you can touch us Episcopalians. This...thing was performed by a bunch of elderly Call to |

Submitted by Truth Unites... and Divides
at 5/7/2008 10:23:39 PM| I wasn't even tempted to watch it when I read CJ's post and warning. Having read through the comment thread, I'm still not tempted to watch it, nor will I. The thought that the worship of God as being a source of mockery and shame deeply angers me. Jesus throwing out the moneychangers for desecrating His Father's house is what I think this compares to. |

Submitted by Just Wondering
at 5/7/2008 10:45:03 PM| What is it with leftists & their fetish for those big creepy puppets? |

Submitted by Mark
at 5/7/2008 10:59:39 PM| From Wikipedia: "Call To Action has been criticized for its left-wing views by the Vatican which declared CTA's views to be irreconcilable with the Catholic faith; these controversial positions of CTA have even resulted in a general excommunication for all its members in one diocese in the United States."
|

Submitted by Carl Farbman
at 5/7/2008 11:14:11 PM| I see the good 'ol Horse Breeding Bishop Remi De Roo presided. Can't keep a good man down, I say. |

Submitted by Carl Farbman
at 5/7/2008 11:48:05 PM| I especially liked the beginning part where the woman dances with Shaquille O'Neal. |

Submitted by Ken
at 5/7/2008 11:51:56 PM| Criticized not just by the Vatican; God bless Bp. Bruskewich of the diocese of Lincoln, NE.
The legislation of the Diocesan Synod, which is in full force, states, "The faithful are prohibited from maintaining membership in any condemned, prohibited, or disapproved societies or organizations. These include the Masons (and their auxiliary organizations), Planned Parenthood, Society of Pius X, Call to Action (in its various forms), Catholics for a Free Choice, the Hemlock Society." Catholics who would disobey this legislation commit mortal sins of disobedience and endangering their faith and they also incur sever ecclesiastical censures which the Synod sets forth in Article 177. Your parish priest can give you a copy of the Synodal laws if you ask him for one. |

Submitted by Carl Farbman
at 5/7/2008 11:56:57 PM| That blonde woman in the black skirt just keeps on dancing. And the guy in the pajamas keeps popping up, too! And I really like the guy in the white Hammer pants. They move so gracefully, you almost forget the fact that this is supposed to be a Christian liturgy that feature 7 feet tall puppets, the saddest looking "choir" I've ever seen, in the ugliest ballroom, and a homilest that asks for a single clap (not clapping; a single synchronized clap!) in the middle of her... talk. The good news, folks, is that there's a serious over-representation of 65 year old women with long dangly earings. |

Submitted by CarolynP
at 5/7/2008 11:59:59 PM| OK, all you chickens that wouldn't watch the video - Cowboy Up and watch it, dammit! Really, it is character-building. |

Submitted by Consanescerion
at 5/8/2008 12:24:34 AM| Here's a good article on this dissidentfest: Irreconcilable with the Catholic Faith In December 2006, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, wrote to Bishop Bruskewitz that the Vatican was upholding his decision. “The activities of ‘Call to Action’ in the course of these years are in contrast with the Catholic Faith due to views and positions held which are unacceptable from a doctrinal and disciplinary standpoint,” wrote Cardinal Re. “Thus to be a member of this Association or to support it, is irreconcilable with a coherent living of the Catholic Faith.” |

Submitted by Consanescerion
at 5/8/2008 12:32:00 AM| I'm glad I didn't see that live. I'd have laughed myself sick. They'd have had to carry me out in a stretcher. The dancing and puppets... These people damager their own souls with such actions, not God's Church. |

Submitted by Katherine
at 5/8/2008 12:38:02 AM| I am grateful that my connection here is too slow for me to watch videos, and I extend my sincere sympathy to my Catholic brethren here who DID watch it. The descriptions and the photo of the papier mache monsters were enough! Fuinseoig, chapatis could be valid matter. They are made from wheat flour, unleavened. They might be the only, er, kosher item in the whole mess. On the other hand, pita bread is probably leavened and therefore invalid. We'll never know. It's better that way. |

Submitted by LaVallette
at 5/8/2008 1:35:52 AM| 1) Current edition of Time Magazine "Is Liberal
Catholicsm Dead" (Answer yes, despite the effort
of Call to Action) 2) The video: yesterday's people striving to be relevant. Whats your guess about the average at least 60 plus. Very few young people. 3) There is a kindergarten feel about the whole "shabang", the dancing, the singing. the paper dolls etc. |

Submitted by Gregg the obscure_
at 5/8/2008 7:01:16 AM| Pathetic. Unsurprising, but pathetic. The closing blurb about respecting the dignity of all people was a real topper. As if anyone who had been through that had any remaining dignity! The one time I was exposed to liturgical dance was worse than this one, so it was comparatively easy to watch this video. During my last summer in TEC, the pastor was on vacation and the visiting cleric was a man in his mid sixties who insisted on being called "Father Dick". Things went reasonably well until the homily, at which point he took off vestments and danced about wearing a leotard, tights and (presumably) a codpiece. I took a long walk. The left's versions of liturgical art include horribly disfigured human images (like the aforementioned puppets or the cartoons on the OCP missalettes) more often than not. Just sayin'. |

Submitted by Ruzzel
at 5/8/2008 7:19:08 AM| Coud you abuse the a thurible worse than that; it makes my Anglo-Catholic soul shiver! |

Submitted by saint
at 5/8/2008 7:20:24 AM| But CTA is Fair Trade certified so they must MDG compliant, ergo, orthodox! |

Submitted by Chris Molter
at 5/8/2008 7:31:17 AM| Let's be clear. These CTA folks aren't Catholics. Also, I think faithful Catholics and Anglicans can rejoice together that this sort of liturgical idiocy (which can occur on either side of the Tiber or Thames) is appealing only to the greying haired hippie type who is rapidly approaching their expiration date. |

Submitted by Floridian
at 5/8/2008 8:16:44 AM| A festive celebration like this one can only be properly understood and analyzed upon by someone with extensive training and experience in this sort of thing - our perceptive friend, Clown Celebrant+. Where can he have gotten off to just when we need him most? |

Submitted by Whitestone
at 5/8/2008 8:18:56 AM| Ah, yes, Floridian, only CC+ will be able to appreciate the subtle Nuances (TM)of this event. |

Submitted by Texas Bama Fan
at 5/8/2008 8:29:51 AM| I didn't see any really small kids (i.e. under 7) in the group. I guess that's because those giant head thingies are just too frightening. I felt bad for them though for their lack of quality equipment. I mean I used to collect and use those Paul Masson wine caraffes when I was a poor broke newlywed. And Greg, I can't get the image of your dancing Fr. Dick out of my head now! |

Submitted by MIST
at 5/8/2008 9:32:06 AM| (Oops, hit that enter key too soon) OK, after reading many comments, I decided to be brave. oh, my goodness! Fast forward was a great way to watch most of it. I thought the patty-cake thing near the end was pretty novel. Pretty strange watching the aging men actually joining in that activity. I don't think I know men who would do that. |

Submitted by Sasha
at 5/8/2008 9:39:55 AM| No, CarolynP: I know enough of "contemporary" 'Eucharistic' services (and have heard of worse still) to shun any place that includes 'liturgical dance'!!! That is an automatic betrayal of what I believe in liturgically; while any place that denies/avoids use of the Traditional Holy Trinity of Father, Son and Holy Ghost is off my visitation list as far as services are concerned!! In fact, I hope that any and all such places (they're not worthy to be called 'churches' - more appropriate would be 'synagogues of Satan'!!!) will lose attendance so quickly and totally as to go into RAPID BANKRUPTCY and forced to sell off their assets ASAP!!!!! That's what they deserve, with positively NO pity or mercy whatsoever!!! |

Submitted by Ed the Roman
at 5/8/2008 10:06:05 AM| The walker count in that congregation was rather high. Did anybody else notice the assistant crucifer in a wheelchair? This episode demonstrates again that if you want something really, totally %$&^ed up, you need a Catholic bishop. |

Submitted by The Pilgrim
at 5/8/2008 10:24:26 AM"Got any wierd Orthodox or Lutheran videos to share with us?" I can't speak for the Lutherans, but for the Orthodox, the answer is NO! |

Submitted by Mark
at 5/8/2008 10:49:45 AM| Pilgrim - only because no one has yet dared film such horrors as the royal doors left open during the consecration, the creed spoken instead of sung, or the laity kneeling during the Great Entrance or on a Sunday. Shocking though they are, all of these things have been documented on the web.
(wink) |

Submitted by Fuinseoig
at 5/8/2008 11:54:32 AM| Yes, Christopher, I grant you that, but at least the Trinity crowd were all people. We had giant puppets concelebrating (or what looks like it as near as makes no nevermind). That, coupled with the Barney mass, makes me wonder what the hey it is about puppets that is so attractive to the left-leaning of my co-religionists? Katherine, I don't know whether to hope they were valid matter or not. What a choice, hey?"I know enough of "contemporary" 'Eucharistic' services (and have heard of worse still) to shun any place that includes 'liturgical dance'!!!" Sasha, this is one thing you and I are in absolute, total, heartfelt agreement on. Preach it, brother! :-) |

Submitted by Truth Unites... and Divides
at 5/8/2008 12:13:16 PM| I watched the video where the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence celebrated and received the elements of the Eucharist from Archbishop Niederauer in the diocese of San Francisco. I thought that was a travesty. Is this one worse than that? Egads! Maybe Cardinal Kasper has an either/or question for these liberal liturgical celebrants in the RCC as well. |

Submitted by Jerry Sexton
at 5/8/2008 12:39:28 PM| Satan loves to mock Christianity ... so, once again, I have to repeat myself ... there are only two kinds of Catholics: conservatives and heretics. |

Submitted by Gayle
at 5/8/2008 12:42:40 PM| I watched it twice, the first time I could only take about 30 seconds. The second time I made it a whole minute.
Oh joy! Another reason to be ashamed of my generation. I am so sick of baby-boomers trying to hold onto the sixties. When are they going to figure out that: WE WERE WRONG!!!! Please help me out here. In all honesty was there anything good that really came out of the counter-culture movement? Was there anything that was even original? How I long for the days when there was shame attached to having a baby out of wedlock or getting divorced. The pendulum has swung way, way too far to the left, which scares me when I think what the center will eventually look like. |

Submitted by Sibyl
at 5/8/2008 1:47:56 PM| Gayle, the world hungers for the holy and the true and for true love...it just looks in all the wrong places like a rat in a maze until it finally tastes and sees that the Lord Jesus Christ is good and more than fulfills all their desires. That's why it's such a #*%&$#* tragedy when the Church holds up a false Lord or denies Him. |

Submitted by Ken
at 5/8/2008 1:48:07 PM| I have never heard that the Mass at which the "Sisters" of Perpetual Indulgence made their appearance was a liturgical travesty, only a moral and ecclesial one. Of course, Catholic blogs have worked over that event ad infinitum, but we will never know if Bishop Niederauer knew what was going on or what. |

Submitted by Fr. J.
at 5/8/2008 2:02:15 PM| It is better for the soul to be entertained than dismayed at such antics. Yes, there are goofy Catholics in California and other places, just like there are goofy everything else. But the fact that there is goofyness to be found on all sides papers over the very real differences between the churches. The real and very essential difference between Catholicsm and Anglicanism is leadership and ecclesiology/polity. Where is the leadership going? And does this leadership have the authority to hold to Christian teaching in a wayward world? The differences between Rowan and Benedict are nothing less than astounding, to say nothing of KJS. Benedict has launched the most significant recovery of tradition in the history of Christianity with the liberation of the Tridentine Mass and all its attendant theological underpinnings. Rowan is floundering in the precise moment the AC needs a solid apostle to lead it out of treachery. Benedict is working to lead the West to her moral and spiritual roots and Rowan is full steam ahead to decay. Furthermore, even if Rowan were a stalwart of historical Christian teaching, he does not have the apparatus to lead effectively. Anglican polity which is allergic to real authority guaratees that those with the appearance of authority have no real power. This is a problem. This fact alone leads to theological entropy and institutional chaos. On the other hand, Rome appoints all bishops. Now that is a case where the one responsible is empowered to fulfill that responsibility! And the Catholic ship, the barque of Peter has been steadily correcting her course since 1978. It takes a couple generations to recover from the errors committed in one single decade (1968-1978). Anglicanism now has the errors of 4 decades to recover from. Hmmm.... So videos of Catholic silliness are non threatening amusement as they do not represent where the Church is or is going. But videos of Anglican silliness reveal the true nature of the present disorder of the Anglican world. |

Submitted by Sodbuster
at 5/8/2008 2:09:15 PM| I know of no genuinely Lutheran examples, but they probably exist, as we are all simul iustus et peccator, at best. Oh, there was the polka mass with 'roll out the barrel' being the tune right before the Sacrament of the Altar, and the soft-shoe shuffle about 'feeling the spirit' and 'calling down the spirit' for the Feast Day of Pentacost. The barque of Justinian is still correcting for 500 years of error from the Great Schism to Vatican II. Much progress has been made, much more is still to be. |

Submitted by Fr. J.
at 5/8/2008 2:10:18 PM| Ken said: I have never heard that the Mass at which the "Sisters" of Perpetual Indulgence made their appearance was a liturgical travesty, only a moral and ecclesial one. Of course, Catholic blogs have worked over that event ad infinitum, but we will never know if Bishop Niederauer knew what was going on or what. Oh, I think the bishop knew what was up. If you look at the video closely you see that he raised his hand in blessing over the first "nun" until "she" leaned in and insisted he give "her" communion. I think he felt intimidated by the situation and later felt embarrassed for not having stood his ground. He simply wasnt prepared for having to say: "Give you communion? Not with you dressed like that I wont." Whatever happened, this case demonstrates the differences between Anglicanism and Catholicism. Nobody is going into Anglican churches to desacrate them on account of their teaching on homosexuality or anything else. Such desecrations are almost commonplace against the Catholic Church precisely because in her teaching she holds her ground. Remember, Integrity runs TEC General Conventions. Dignity is permanently banned from all Catholic Church property in the US. |

Submitted by InNewark
at 5/8/2008 2:11:52 PM| Gayle--as a fellow boomer, I know exactly what you mean. However,most of those people were too old to be boomers--more like Spong's generation, the parents of boomers. |

Submitted by Sodbuster
at 5/8/2008 2:11:58 PM| I know of no genuinely Lutheran examples, but they probably exist, as we are all simul iustus et peccator, at best. Oh, there was the polka mass with 'roll out the barrel' being the tune right before the Sacrament of the Altar, and the soft-shoe shuffle about 'feeling the spirit' and 'calling down the spirit' for the Feast Day of Pentacost. The barque of Justinian is still correcting for 500 years of error from the Great Schism to Vatican II. Much progress has been made, much more is still to be. |

Submitted by Pascal
at 5/8/2008 2:38:47 PM| Being a non-roman catholic, as I an a confirmed anglican and attend an orthodox anglo-catholic parish, and also teach in a roman catholic high school, I have been frequently treated to similar liturgical insanities. This "extravaganza" is only different in the magnitude of its eccentricities but not the overall attitude of most post vatican II RCs. They crave to change the attitudes of the worshippers through liturgy rather than focusing on a transcendent and holy God. They are using God-speak to mask a social justice agenda rather than commune at the altar. I cannot recall how many times I have heard that we are not a people of the cross but easter people. In one school mass, we were "treated" to a communion hymn which was Joan Osbourne's "What if God was one of us". I particularly appreciated the spiritually enlightening and uplifting line of the song which stated; "what is God was one of us...just a BUM like one of us..tyring to find his way home...no one calling on the phone"..simply wonderful!!!!While we are treated with theologically deficient homilies, that is, referring to the Holy Spirit as an it..and also as "the bond of love between the Father and Son". An endless referral to Jesus as our "brother" and never as our SAVIOR. The chapel had a picture of "earth" Jesus sitting in the lotus position with deer antlers coming out of his head..This was behind the reredos..I kid you not..and I could go on and on... Honestly, one of the greatest impediments to me swimming the Tiber is the reality that I may die spiritually from the pollution. |

Submitted by The Pilgrim
at 5/8/2008 2:46:24 PMI haven't seen the video yet. I screwed up my courage and clicked on the link. This showed up: Your website has been suspended! The web hosting account that hosts this website has been blocked due to high bandwidth usage! If you are the owner of this website, please login to your hosting Control Panel and order additional traffic quota. If you are a visitor to this website, please access this page later. This website is hosted by lonex.com. I guess God was doing form me that time! |

Submitted by Fr. J.
at 5/8/2008 2:54:34 PM| Pascal, I do not doubt you have experienced what you report. But, it is not safe to generalize from one's limited personal experience. In my diocese here in Northern Indiana, there were only a couple flaky parishes in the past and they have been regularized. Parishes here are devout, and no-nonsense. This is also true for Catholic Church in the rest of the state of Indiana (with the possible exception of Belleville) and outside of Chicagoland, the Church in Illinois is staunchly traditional in places like Peoria, for instance. My home diocese in northern Virginia is quite rigidly conservative and the old liberal hold out of Richmond, Va is normalizing rapidly. To deny that the Catholic Church is in rapid recovery in the US and around the world is to betray a nearly complete unfamiliarity with all things Catholic. To put quite a fine point on it, even Notre Dame has a weekly Tridentine Mass. I would never have guessed that would happen even a year ago--and I live there! |

Submitted by Mrs. Lawrence
at 5/8/2008 3:28:51 PM| Call to Action...yawn...they've only just discovered Spong? The pot must be going to their heads faster these days. Call to Action is evil and stupid. Kicking against the goads is probably the proper description. Anyone that thinks Call to Action is viewed as an authentic expression of Catholicism by intelligent and reasonable Catholics much less the Vatican is kidding themselves. There are probably quite a few bishops (like Gumbleton for instance) who think Call to Action is somewhat valid but if Gumbleton's resignation has not been accepted by the Vatican, it soon will be. |

Submitted by nolongeranglican
at 5/8/2008 3:45:15 PM| I echo F. J's comments above. I was an Episcopalian for decades until I could no longer endure the pain of the decline. I completed RCIA and joined the Catholic Church last year. I did so only after I visited Reformed Episcopal and Anglican places of worship and accomplished a significant amount of research. I could not be happier with my choice. The Catholic Church is not perfect, but the Church is working in a number of repects to correct errors in the past, and is re-establishing conservative theology as the foundation. There will always be aberrations but I am confident steps will be taken, albeit too slowly for some, to eliminate such foolishness. |












But watching it did cause me to come up with a very apt phrase to describe it " liturgical masturbation."