MEET THE PRESS

Good morning and welcome to Meet the Press. I'm Tim Russert. The Anglican Communion, the third largest group of Christians in the world, has been in a state of continual ferment ever since the consecration of Gene Robinson, a partnered gay man, as Episcopal Bishop of New Hampshire in 2003. Here to discuss the current state of the Anglican controversy is the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church and the first woman ever to head an Anglican province, the Most Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori. Bishop Schori, welcome.
It's a pleasure to be here, Tom.
Tim. Bishop, you recently caused a good bit of controversy when you claimed that there were other partnered gay bishops in the Anglican Communion and that the provinces they serve really needed to be honest about it. Care to elaborate?
Certainly, Tim. We feel that since we are by no means unique in having a partnered gay bishop among our number, that other provinces need to be as honest about what is going on as we are.
And you know this how?
What?

How do you know that there are other partnered gay bishops in the Anglican Communion?
It's perfectly obvious.
Why?
The metanarrative.
???

???
You're yanking my chain, aren't you?
No, no, not at all. It's common knowledge that there are a number of partnered gay bishops in other Anglican provinces.
If it's common knowledge, then why don't I or anyone else seem to know about it?
I don't know. Maybe you need to get out more, Tony.
Tim. But let me approach this another way. How many other partnered gay bishops are there in the Anglican Communion?
I'm not at liberty to say.
Why not?
Obviously, there are privacy issues involved as well as cultural contexts that must be taken into consideration, Thorvald.
Tim. Bishop, MCJ editor-in-chief Christopher Johnson recently had this to say about your claim.
Well, gee whiz, Tim, I see this in two ways. One is that this is a kind of liberal McCarthyism, Bishop Schori essentially stating, "I have here a list of so many known partnered gay bishops in the Anglican Communion." The other is as a kind of projection, a postmodern wish fulfillment if you will. The Episcopal Church needs this to be true so they just decide that it is and go from there. They can't provide any actual facts so they just assume their narrative is true and that anybody who doesn't believe it must be a bigot even if the narrative is as fictional as John Chane's connection to anything remotely resembling orthodox Christianity.
Bishop? Your reaction?
Tim, I categorically reject Johnson's assertions. Admittedly, we can't and won't provide any actual names for reasons I just explained. But it's common knowledge that there are plenty of gay bishops in the Anglican Communion.
And once again, Bishop, I have to ask how you know. Prior to your ordination, you were a scientist, an oceanographer, I believe.
That's correct.
Wouldn't a scientist demand, well, actual evidence? Proof?
Tim, I don't know if we have time to go into this now but there's a considerable difference between real and factual. Just because something is true doesn't mean that it's actually the case. And vice versa. Any educated person knows that.
Bishop, aren't you essentially presuming that this or that bishop is gay until he can prove he isn't? Aren't you asking him to prove a negative?
Obviously, Tim, you don't understand science.
Apparently not. Moving on, Bishop, this isn't the first time you've been embroiled in controversy. In a 2006 New York Times interview, you seemed to imply that people who had a lot of children were dumber than a bag of hammers.
That statement was taken completely out of context and, I might add, distorted by conservative Anglican boogers.
Bloggers.
Whatever. In that interview, I was trying to state that the more educated you are, the fewer children you tend to have and that's been borne out statistically, Tancred.
Tim. But let's look at your complete statement in its context, shall we?
How many members of the Episcopal Church are there in this country?
About 2.2 million. It used to be larger percentagewise, but Episcopalians tend to be better-educated and tend to reproduce at lower rates than some other denominations. Roman Catholics and Mormons both have theological reasons for producing lots of children. Anyway, those mackeral snappers are frigging PEZ dispensers if you ask me. Beers!! Make me another Manhattan, you little bitch, and do it right this time or I swear to God, you'll be out on your ass!!Katharine Jefferts Schori
New York Times
November 19, 2006

Bishop?
I NEVER SAID THAT!!
That's your story. But common knowledge suggests that you wanted to. I mean, everybody knows that this is what you really think. Anyway, can you prove that you didn't say it?
Well, no, but, I mean, I wouldn't dream of saying anything so...
I'm afraid that's all the time we have. Thank you very much for joining us this morning, Bishop Schori.
WAIT A MINUTE!! NOW YOU JUST WAIT ONE SECOND!!
Join us again next week for Meet the Press.
Once again, thanks to Wuzzadem for the inspiration.

Submitted by diane
at 1/8/2008 4:20:33 PM| No fair!! My colleagues in adjoining pods (we're too cheap to have cubes :)) are wondering why I am laughing my head off. "Boogers"--ROTFL! |

Submitted by Truth Unites... and Divides
at 1/8/2008 4:37:08 PM| Brilliant! This post alone should win you 2008 Individual Anglican Booger of the Year! |

Submitted by David Fischler
at 1/8/2008 4:42:34 PM| Priceless! I know I would vote for you for Anglican Booger of the Year (at least if you voted for me for Presbyterian Booger of the Year). |

Submitted by Jim McNeely
at 1/8/2008 5:09:58 PM| I'm not laughing. Not because it isn't funny (it is), but because this is EXACTLY the kind of thing that could actually happen if Dr. Schori came on with Russert. |

Submitted by The Little Myrmidon
at 1/8/2008 5:31:50 PM| Aaaahh, I think Russert would be wetting his pants to try and make the PB look good and unknown partnered bishops OK. All the usual lib-buzzwords. Committed relationships, etc, etc, etc. He is a Liberal, ya know.
OK, it is funny, though. |

Submitted by unreconstructed rebel
at 1/8/2008 5:48:18 PM| I never before noticed the poodle look. Hilarious! Now I don't have to get burned for saying "Her Squidness". |

Submitted by Antique
at 1/8/2008 7:25:24 PM| A Manhattan. Sheesh! I must be getting slow. I definitely had her drink pegged as being a White Lady. Who says blogs aren't educational? |

Submitted by sibyl
at 1/8/2008 7:27:54 PM| You, Christopher S. Johnson, must be the funniest and smartest man on the planet. Without you, this whole horrible situation would be unbearable. You are therapy. |

Submitted by Jeffersonian
at 1/8/2008 7:42:15 PM| Can we start the countdown to the actual interview yet? Remember, anything you say about TEC eventually comes true... |

Submitted by The Little Myrmidon
at 1/8/2008 7:48:57 PM| That's funny, I'd have thought she liked Mudslides. |

Submitted by Khawk
at 1/8/2008 8:37:16 PM| Brilliant - word is the Purple Haze now has Beers whipping up a wicked "Hypnotic" Tini - straight up. |

Submitted by dwstroudmd
at 1/8/2008 8:39:43 PM| Stop it! STOP it! STOP IT!!! I can't breathe! Oh, God, make him stop it! I mean, make her stop it! (large sucking inhalational sound effect) STOP it!!!! |

Submitted by Father Wilson
at 1/8/2008 8:47:30 PM| Christopher, I agree. You are the funniest man on the planet. I think God created Frank Griswold and Madame Schori because He had already created you and wasn't sure how to keep you occupied. |

Submitted by bridgit
at 1/8/2008 10:30:14 PM| I was just thinking today that you are the funniest man on the web and you just confirmed it! (I was remembering one of your Anglican Investigator's on my long, boring drive home, The drive home was boring, not your Anglican Investigator. . . )Please keep writing, I agree with Father Wilson above. . .God does bring good out of evil and He has a sense of humor! Cheers. bridgit P.S. If you and Gale Price ever meet up for dinner between ST. Louis and Detroit let me know because I live in between you two and I would pay good money to listen to you two discuss anything. I am not a stalker. |

Submitted by bridgit
at 1/8/2008 10:32:41 PM| Good Lord, I meant Dale Price! But if you know a Gale Price I'd probably want to eavesdrop on that conversation too! |

Submitted by NZTess
at 1/8/2008 10:38:48 PM| Yeah I agree with the above, you are the funniest writer on the net. I began reading your blog years ago because Mark Shea kept linking to it. I just ended up staying. |

Submitted by carolynP
at 1/8/2008 10:39:35 PM| I laughed so hard my stomach hurt. Christopher, you are a comedic genius. |

Submitted by ForNow
at 1/8/2008 11:17:03 PM| This affair of motionless statues, icons, or photographic images engaged in dialogue is, as they say, right from the start. Unassailable is the segue whereby a distinction between reality and actuality leads, in post-modernist hands, to the assertion that bishops are deductively gay with a given probability unaccompanied by evidence. |

Submitted by J. Scott
at 1/8/2008 11:48:41 PM| there's a considerable difference between real and factual. Just because something is true doesn't mean that it's actually the case. And vice versa. Any educated person knows that.
Liberal in-duh-lectualism in a nutshell. Pure genius, Chris. |

Submitted by Kathleen Lundquist
at 1/8/2008 11:55:44 PM| You know what my favorite moment was? Seeing Butters from South Park playing the role of our august host and hearing his spot-on commentary (in my head) in Butters' slurry, eager-to-please little 8-year-old voice. Just beyond! You've outdone yourself yet again, Chris. We love you. |

Submitted by apple pie
at 1/9/2008 12:17:05 AM| Dear Chris: As you know, at this time in my life I desperately needed some humor! Thank you so much for this gift!! Tonight, I will rest a little easier having had this laughter!! |

Submitted by Katherine
at 1/9/2008 2:04:17 AM| Hilarious! It started out so reasonably that I thought for a few frames it might be true. |

Submitted by NZTess
at 1/9/2008 5:29:14 AM| Hey, lets compare what the Episcopal Presiding Bishop has to say with what the Latin Rite Presiding Bishop of Rome (aka the Pope) has to say. http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/185212?eng=y |

Submitted by Athanasius Returns
at 1/9/2008 11:14:31 AM| Mr. Johnson, We, the attorneys of Splurt, Spitt, Boisterous, Guffaw, and Hurl hereby inform you of our intent to enter a lawsuit against MCJ with the purpose of enjoining you from presenting such material as the foregoing without initially and prophylactically informing your devoted readership (bloggership? or would that be boogership?) of the resultant imminent and likely harm to their computers, keyboards, monitors, mouses, peripherals, flat panels, plasma screens, and sides (obliques, abdominals, solar plexuses, and other physiological muscle groups). Perhaps you could proactively provide such warnings from here on, and thus, perhaps we, representing the esteemed and august Athanasius Returns, will halt such proceedings as delineated herein. Legally yours, Mai-Saidz B. Hertin, for the Firm |

Submitted by Allen Lewis
at 1/9/2008 11:52:20 AM| What I liked was Russert's reaction to "the metanarrative". ??? ??? ??? Christopher, This was one of your best yet! Well worth the wait for the image download!! |

Submitted by saint
at 1/9/2008 12:00:41 PM| I keep coming back and rereading this and for some insane reason, 'Thorvald' just sends me into hysterics. |

Submitted by Rick in Louisiana
at 1/9/2008 12:09:35 PM| Brilliant stuff. Although satirical/humorous there is disturbing similarity to how the Presiding Bishop really does think and talk. I try very hard to respect my "opponents" (or people who work/advocate for causes and positions I reject). But over the last several months I have been pushed and forced into a position which I do not like at all - I am beginning to think the Presiding Bishop is, um, despicable. Mean, nasty, and despicable. Myrmidion - do not diss the Tim Russert. I don't care if he is a liberal or not. I used to watch "Meet the Press" every Sunday morning and he has impressed me as very fair. I have seen him challenge and press liberals just as much as conservatives on his program. Do not diss the Tim Russert. |

Submitted by BishopofBray
at 1/9/2008 12:18:33 PM| For future reference, the Presiding Bishop prefers Cosmopolitans. Also her pet name for Mr Beers is "Snufflekins". Versimilitude can only be achieved when you get the details right. It's the Episcopalian way. |

Submitted by saint
at 1/9/2008 12:21:46 PM| Indeed, the Russert is a global phenomenon - even seen on Australian TV |

Submitted by Ed the Roman
at 1/9/2008 12:51:21 PMVersimilitude can only be achieved when you get the details right. It's the Episcopalian way.Which is why Episcopalians are on occasion damned for having eaten soup with a dessert spoon. |

Submitted by
at 1/9/2008 4:29:26 PM| Now how about an interview with Dan Rathers .... or she could be on the Jay Leno show. |

Submitted by Bill B (AKA Theocoid)
at 1/9/2008 7:19:11 PM| Nearly spewed shiraz all over my flat screen. |

Submitted by Clown Celebrant
at 1/9/2008 11:07:14 PM| Just hilarious! I woke the house with my bursts of laughter. |

Submitted by Truth Unites... and Divides
at 1/9/2008 11:49:14 PM| I just had to look and read this again. It's soooo funny. I actually laughed more this time because I focused in on the PBess's picture. She has a long peanut head. Or maybe it's her hairstyle. Whatever it was. She has a long peanut head. |

Submitted by James G
at 1/10/2008 9:35:19 AM| I almost died laughing at "frigging PEZ dispensers." Truly hilarious. James G |

Submitted by Chazaq
at 1/10/2008 12:39:36 PM| Chris Johnson, you are the most brilliant humor-gifted Anglican booger in the whole galaxy. I'm still cleaning the applesauce off my keyboard. |

Submitted by Russert Fan
at 1/10/2008 12:49:49 PM| Funny! Of course Tim's producers probably got a good chewing after he got off the air for not telling him about Peter Tatchell's group Outrage! and the outing of the 14 Anglican bishops back in 1994. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Tatchell |

Submitted by Irenaeus
at 1/10/2008 2:11:47 PM| Brilliant! Now if KJS would similarly substantiate the persistent allegations about polygamy by orthodox African bishops and the Ahmanson billions funding the Anglican Communion Network. I want a metanarrative peek and a culturally sensitive wire transfer. |

Submitted by Ken
at 1/10/2008 3:34:32 PM| I think this rates a permanent link on the sidebar. Pez dispenser indeed! |

Submitted by saint
at 1/10/2008 4:04:53 PM| "Pez dispenser" is just ECUSA-endorsed-purple-coated-speak for "breeders" by über gradutates of the University of Michigan. Ya gotta live into the lingo there Ken. :-) |

Submitted by Been There...
at 1/10/2008 9:08:33 PM| Chris ... You may have just hit the longest homerun in the history of Anglican/Episcopal blogdom...or is boogerdom, I know it was really good because my wife didn't "get it." hee, hee. And, you actually made Chris Matthews appear somewhat intelligent. Way to go!!!! Been There... |

Submitted by Paolo
at 1/11/2008 8:22:21 PM| I'm happily Catholic but (or, better, therefore) this blog is and always will be at the top of my list, one reason (apart from the fact that CJ is a serious Christian) being the presence of such genial pieces. Humor is a true sign of living faith. Let me say it in my language: ECCEZIONALE!!! |

Submitted by Jeffrey Lord
at 1/17/2008 10:18:57 AM| Even as a theologically-progressive, gay-affirming, Episcopal-aligned Christian, I've got to say: Schori is an unmitigated disaster, who doesn't seem to have the vaguest clue what "traditional Anglican theological pluralism" -- as practiced in Britain -- is all about. I expect the HOB to finally, belatedly, muster the gumption and cohones to veto most of her imperial fiats and dictats. Following up on that hilarious Russett piece: my favorite "815 Episco-Penthouse Photo Of The Week" is available here: http://tinyurl.com/22yyyc Caption: "PB Schori Mandates 'New Design' For Liturgical Vestments!" LOL! |












peace,
Zach